Key publications
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2019). Unpacking ‘regime resistance’ in low-carbon transitions: the case of the British Capacity Market. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101278-101278.
Hoggett RD (2017). People, Demand and Governance in Future Energy Systems.
Abstract:
People, Demand and Governance in Future Energy Systems
The energy system within Great Britain has to decarbonise whilst maintaining security and affordability, and this requires coordinated action across the whole energy system. The energy system is already undergoing fundamental change due to a wide range of technological, social and economic drivers, and there is some consensus that direction of travel is towards decentralisation and the demand side. These changes are much closer to people and there is a need to recognise, and value, the central role that they play within the energy system, not only in terms of creating demand, but also in terms of adopting technologies, changing behaviour and accepting change in the places that they live and work. This paper explores these issues by taking a high level overview of the energy system and the pressures it faces and by examining how systems are beginning to change and how they might change. This leads to a number of key findings including the need to put end users at the centre of the energy system to enable engagement, gain meaningful consent and to build legitimacy and trust. In addition, the central role that governance plays in enabling this to happen is highlighted, along with its importance for facilitating a coordinated approach to a demand focussed, future energy system. This requires a new fit for purpose governance framework.
Abstract.
Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Lockwood M, Hoggett R (2017). Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition.
Energy Research and Social Science,
28, 58-67.
Abstract:
Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition
© 2017 Elsevier LtdThis article shines a light on a less examined aspect of sustainable energy transitions: governing for demand side innovations in Germany. Demand innovations are considered to be central to affordable, efficient and politically acceptable energy system transformations, however many argue that not enough is being done in governance terms. In a departure from much analysis on demand policy demand innovations are defined broadly here to explicitly include demand side response, demand reduction and distributed energy – given that each has important roles to play within demand-oriented markets. Demand governance is conceptualised as a long-term political process that is both contextually specific but also open to challenge and change at various points in time. The single case study is Germany where demand governance, recent changes in energy markets, and implications for how the politics of energy are changing are all analysed. This paper reveals the specific ways in which critical policy debates emerge over time and influence political decision-making; the ways in which these debates relate to changes in energy markets; as well as a lack of governance in relation to enabling demand side response and local energy markets.
Abstract.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R, Kuzemko C (2017). The governance of industry rules and energy system innovation: the case of codes in Great Britain. Utilities Policy
Kuzemko C, Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research & Social Science, 12, 96-105.
Lockwood M, Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 312-333.
Publications by category
Journal articles
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2020). Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: the case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity. Energy Policy, 140, 111426-111426.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2019). Unpacking ‘regime resistance’ in low-carbon transitions: the case of the British Capacity Market. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101278-101278.
Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Lockwood M, Hoggett R (2017). Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition.
Energy Research and Social Science,
28, 58-67.
Abstract:
Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition
© 2017 Elsevier LtdThis article shines a light on a less examined aspect of sustainable energy transitions: governing for demand side innovations in Germany. Demand innovations are considered to be central to affordable, efficient and politically acceptable energy system transformations, however many argue that not enough is being done in governance terms. In a departure from much analysis on demand policy demand innovations are defined broadly here to explicitly include demand side response, demand reduction and distributed energy – given that each has important roles to play within demand-oriented markets. Demand governance is conceptualised as a long-term political process that is both contextually specific but also open to challenge and change at various points in time. The single case study is Germany where demand governance, recent changes in energy markets, and implications for how the politics of energy are changing are all analysed. This paper reveals the specific ways in which critical policy debates emerge over time and influence political decision-making; the ways in which these debates relate to changes in energy markets; as well as a lack of governance in relation to enabling demand side response and local energy markets.
Abstract.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R, Kuzemko C (2017). The governance of industry rules and energy system innovation: the case of codes in Great Britain. Utilities Policy
Kuzemko C, Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research & Social Science, 12, 96-105.
Lockwood M, Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 312-333.
Hoggett R, Bolton R, Candelise C, Kern F, Mitchell C, Yan J (2014). Supply chains and energy security in a low carbon transition. Applied Energy, 123, 292-295.
Hoggett R, Bolton R, Candelise C, Kern F, Mitchell C, Yan J (2014). Supply chains and energy security in a low carbon transition. Applied Energy, 123, 292-295.
Hoggett R (2014). Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition.
Applied Energy,
123, 296-306.
Abstract:
Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition
This research explores the relationship between technology scale, energy security and decarbonisation within the UK energy system. There is considerable uncertainty about how best to deliver on these goals for energy policy, but a focus on supply chains and their resilience can provide useful insights into the problems uncertainty causes. Technology scale is central to this, and through an analysis of the supply chains of nuclear power and solar photovoltaics, it is suggested that smaller scale technologies are more likely to support and enable a secure, low carbon energy transition. This is because their supply chains are less complex, show more flexibility and adaptability, and can quickly respond to changes within an energy system, and as such they are more resilient than large scale technologies. These characteristics are likely to become increasingly important in a rapidly changing energy system, and prioritising those technologies that demonstrate resilience, flexibility and adaptability will better enable a transition that is rapid, sustainable, secure and affordable.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Hoggett R (2014). Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition.
Applied Energy,
123, 296-306.
Abstract:
Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition
This research explores the relationship between technology scale, energy security and decarbonisation within the UK energy system. There is considerable uncertainty about how best to deliver on these goals for energy policy, but a focus on supply chains and their resilience can provide useful insights into the problems uncertainty causes. Technology scale is central to this, and through an analysis of the supply chains of nuclear power and solar photovoltaics, it is suggested that smaller scale technologies are more likely to support and enable a secure, low carbon energy transition. This is because their supply chains are less complex, show more flexibility and adaptability, and can quickly respond to changes within an energy system, and as such they are more resilient than large scale technologies. These characteristics are likely to become increasingly important in a rapidly changing energy system, and prioritising those technologies that demonstrate resilience, flexibility and adaptability will better enable a transition that is rapid, sustainable, secure and affordable. © 2013 the Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Abstract.
Chapters
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2019). Energy governance in the UK. In Knodt M, Kemmerzell J (Eds.)
The Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe, Springer VS.
Abstract:
Energy governance in the UK
Abstract.
Hoggett R, Eyre N, Keay M (2013). Demand and Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Butler C, Darby S, Henfrey T, Hoggett R, Hole N (2013). People and Communities in Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J, Whiting J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Hoggett R (2013). Supply Chains and Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Conferences
Mitchell CHC, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2017). GB Energy Governance for Innovation, Sustainability and Affordability. Energy Governance: New ideas, new institutions, new people. 28th - 28th Nov 2017.
Mitchell CHC, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD (2017). GB Energy Governance for Innovation, Sustainability and Affordability: an institutional framework. Center for Design, Innovation, and Sustainable Transition. 23rd - 23rd Nov 2017.
Mitchell C, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2016). Governing for Innovation Without Disruption in Energy Systems. Innovation and Disruption – the energy sector in transition. 21st - 22nd Sep 2016.
Lockwood M, Mitchell CHC, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2016). Innovation and the governance of energy industry codes. BIEE 2016, Innovation and Disruption – the energy sector in transition. 21st - 22nd Sep 2016.
Abstract:
Innovation and the governance of energy industry codes
Abstract.
Hoggett RD (2013). Consumer Perspectives on the Future of the UK Gas Network. UKERC– the Future of the UK Gas Network.
Author URL.
Hoggett RD (2013). Understanding Consumer Heat Preferences. UKERC: Low Carbon Heat: Research Gaps & Opportunities.
Author URL.
Reports
Hoggett R (2012).
DECC Electricity Demand Data Sources – Summary Note. Sustainability First.
Author URL.
Hoggett R, Ward J, Mitchell C (2012).
Heat in Homes: Fuel and Technology Preferences in the Domestic Sector. Scotia Gas Networks.
Author URL.
Hoggett R (2011).
Funding the Future: the case for a pre-development capital fund for revenue-generating community renewables. A Policy Brief. Author URL.
McGregor P, Hoggett R, Simpson B, Traill Thomson J, Rafferty L (2011). Skills Report: Prospects for Skills in the Environment Sector. Strengthening the Environment Sector.
Hoggett R, Mitchell C, Woodman B, Baker P (2011). The Key Energy Policy Issues for Energy Security in the UK. Which? the Consumer Association.
Hoggett R, Mitchell C, Woodman B (2011).
The Key Energy Policy Issues for Energy Security in the UK: Summary Report. Which? the Consumer Association..
Author URL.
Hoggett R (2010).
At-risk Finance for Community Renewables – research and policy recommendations on the barriers and opportunities for securing at-risk finance for the early stage development of revenue-generating community renewable energy assets. Author URL.
Hoggett RD (2010).
Community-Owned Renewable Energy Projects. Evidence for their development, funding and sustainability. Author URL.
Publications by year
2020
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2020). Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: the case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity. Energy Policy, 140, 111426-111426.
2019
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2019). Energy governance in the UK. In Knodt M, Kemmerzell J (Eds.)
The Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe, Springer VS.
Abstract:
Energy governance in the UK
Abstract.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2019). Unpacking ‘regime resistance’ in low-carbon transitions: the case of the British Capacity Market. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101278-101278.
2017
Mitchell CHC, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2017). GB Energy Governance for Innovation, Sustainability and Affordability. Energy Governance: New ideas, new institutions, new people. 28th - 28th Nov 2017.
Mitchell CHC, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD (2017). GB Energy Governance for Innovation, Sustainability and Affordability: an institutional framework. Center for Design, Innovation, and Sustainable Transition. 23rd - 23rd Nov 2017.
Hoggett RD (2017). People, Demand and Governance in Future Energy Systems.
Abstract:
People, Demand and Governance in Future Energy Systems
The energy system within Great Britain has to decarbonise whilst maintaining security and affordability, and this requires coordinated action across the whole energy system. The energy system is already undergoing fundamental change due to a wide range of technological, social and economic drivers, and there is some consensus that direction of travel is towards decentralisation and the demand side. These changes are much closer to people and there is a need to recognise, and value, the central role that they play within the energy system, not only in terms of creating demand, but also in terms of adopting technologies, changing behaviour and accepting change in the places that they live and work. This paper explores these issues by taking a high level overview of the energy system and the pressures it faces and by examining how systems are beginning to change and how they might change. This leads to a number of key findings including the need to put end users at the centre of the energy system to enable engagement, gain meaningful consent and to build legitimacy and trust. In addition, the central role that governance plays in enabling this to happen is highlighted, along with its importance for facilitating a coordinated approach to a demand focussed, future energy system. This requires a new fit for purpose governance framework.
Abstract.
Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Lockwood M, Hoggett R (2017). Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition.
Energy Research and Social Science,
28, 58-67.
Abstract:
Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition
© 2017 Elsevier LtdThis article shines a light on a less examined aspect of sustainable energy transitions: governing for demand side innovations in Germany. Demand innovations are considered to be central to affordable, efficient and politically acceptable energy system transformations, however many argue that not enough is being done in governance terms. In a departure from much analysis on demand policy demand innovations are defined broadly here to explicitly include demand side response, demand reduction and distributed energy – given that each has important roles to play within demand-oriented markets. Demand governance is conceptualised as a long-term political process that is both contextually specific but also open to challenge and change at various points in time. The single case study is Germany where demand governance, recent changes in energy markets, and implications for how the politics of energy are changing are all analysed. This paper reveals the specific ways in which critical policy debates emerge over time and influence political decision-making; the ways in which these debates relate to changes in energy markets; as well as a lack of governance in relation to enabling demand side response and local energy markets.
Abstract.
Mitchell CHC, Hoggett RD, Woodman B (2017). Submission: BEIS/Ofgem – Smart, Flexible Energy System – a call for evidence.
Author URL.
Mitchell C, Hoggett RD, Lockwood M (2017). Submission: National Infrastructure Assessment Call for Evidence.
Author URL.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R, Kuzemko C (2017). The governance of industry rules and energy system innovation: the case of codes in Great Britain. Utilities Policy
2016
Mitchell C, Lockwood M, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2016). Governing for Innovation Without Disruption in Energy Systems. Innovation and Disruption – the energy sector in transition. 21st - 22nd Sep 2016.
Kuzemko C, Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research & Social Science, 12, 96-105.
Lockwood M, Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Hoggett R (2016). Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 312-333.
Lockwood M, Mitchell CHC, Hoggett RD, Kuzemko C (2016). Innovation and the governance of energy industry codes. BIEE 2016, Innovation and Disruption – the energy sector in transition. 21st - 22nd Sep 2016.
Abstract:
Innovation and the governance of energy industry codes
Abstract.
2015
Mitchell CHC, Lockwood M, Hoggett R (2015). CMA Code Governance: info request to industry participants.
Author URL.
Mitchell CHC, Hoggett R, Lockwood M, Kuzemko C (2015). Codes Governance and Reform Discussion Paper.
Author URL.
Mitchell C, Woodman B, Kuzemko C, hoggett R (2015). Comments on the CMA Energy Market Investigation. –. Updated Issues Statement.
Mitchell C, Woodman B, lockwood M, Britton J, Kuzemko C, Hoggett R (2015). Comments on the CMA Energy Market Investigation: Provisional Findings and. Poss ible Remedies.
Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Kuzemko C, Hoggett R (2015). Innovation and energy industry codes in Great Britain - EPG Working Paper: 1508.
Abstract:
Innovation and energy industry codes in Great Britain - EPG Working Paper: 1508
This paper examines the role of industry codes in the governance of the energy system in Great Britain, focusing especially on how codes and code governance affect attempts to transform the system to a more sustainable future. We lay out the nature of codes and why they are important for achieving policy change. We then describe the way in which codes are governed, including reforms in the late 2000s and two more recent reviews. Three challenges for the codes system are then discussed in detail: complexity and fragmentation, and how these act as a barrier to new entrants; the gap between code objectives and high level policy aims; and the self-governance approach in a period of rapid transformation. These challenges point to the need for reform. We argue that the two official review processes currently underway are too narrow in nature and a more thorough-going approach is needed. An alternative agenda is then developed. We propose that code modification be undertaken by a dedicated code management body. This would not be located in the regulator (Ofgem) but in an independent system operator. We also suggest various ways of mitigating risk in such an arrangement. The ultimate aim is to make the process of writing industry codes to support policy innovation simple, transparent and technical.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Mitchell C, Woodman B, Kuzemko C, Hoggett R (2015). Public Value Energy Governance.
Abstract:
Public Value Energy Governance
This short Discussion Paper is intended to stimulate discussion about how governance of the energy system in Britain can better keep up with technological, economic and social change. We have set out a possible model for future governance and regulation – which moves from the ‘independent, CEO led’ model currently in Britain to one which is more ‘directed’ and which we argue is more legitimate, transparent and nimble; but which also better suits the characteristics of current technologies (whether supply, demand, storage and ICT integration). We would welcome comments on it by the end of June 2015. Whatever the optimum model for future energy system governance and regulation, though, the fundamental point remains: the current model of regulation in the UK’s gas and electricity systems is no longer fit for purpose.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Woodman B, mitchell C, lowes R, Dutton J, Hoggett R, Steward T, Lockwood M, Kuzemko C (2015). Submission from Energy Policy Group to House of Commons Energy and Climate Change inquiry on ECC priorities for holding Government to account.
Abstract:
Submission from Energy Policy Group to House of Commons Energy and Climate Change inquiry on ECC priorities for holding Government to account
Energy policy priorities for the new (post 2015) Government
Abstract.
Mitchell C, Kuzemko C, Hoggett R, Lockwood M (2015). The IGov Project.
Abstract:
The IGov Project
Presentation to RCUK Strategy Fellowship Team, 23rd February 2015
Abstract.
Author URL.
2014
Mithcell C, Woodman B, Lockwood M, Fitch-Roy O, Steward T, Hoggett RD (2014). Submission to CMA energy market investigation from Energy Policy Group.
Author URL.
Hoggett RD, Lockwood M, Mitchell C, Steward T (2014). Submission to ECCC call for evidence on electricity demand-side measures.
Author URL.
Hoggett R, Bolton R, Candelise C, Kern F, Mitchell C, Yan J (2014). Supply chains and energy security in a low carbon transition. Applied Energy, 123, 292-295.
Hoggett R, Bolton R, Candelise C, Kern F, Mitchell C, Yan J (2014). Supply chains and energy security in a low carbon transition. Applied Energy, 123, 292-295.
Hoggett R (2014). Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition.
Applied Energy,
123, 296-306.
Abstract:
Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition
This research explores the relationship between technology scale, energy security and decarbonisation within the UK energy system. There is considerable uncertainty about how best to deliver on these goals for energy policy, but a focus on supply chains and their resilience can provide useful insights into the problems uncertainty causes. Technology scale is central to this, and through an analysis of the supply chains of nuclear power and solar photovoltaics, it is suggested that smaller scale technologies are more likely to support and enable a secure, low carbon energy transition. This is because their supply chains are less complex, show more flexibility and adaptability, and can quickly respond to changes within an energy system, and as such they are more resilient than large scale technologies. These characteristics are likely to become increasingly important in a rapidly changing energy system, and prioritising those technologies that demonstrate resilience, flexibility and adaptability will better enable a transition that is rapid, sustainable, secure and affordable.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Hoggett R (2014). Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition.
Applied Energy,
123, 296-306.
Abstract:
Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition
This research explores the relationship between technology scale, energy security and decarbonisation within the UK energy system. There is considerable uncertainty about how best to deliver on these goals for energy policy, but a focus on supply chains and their resilience can provide useful insights into the problems uncertainty causes. Technology scale is central to this, and through an analysis of the supply chains of nuclear power and solar photovoltaics, it is suggested that smaller scale technologies are more likely to support and enable a secure, low carbon energy transition. This is because their supply chains are less complex, show more flexibility and adaptability, and can quickly respond to changes within an energy system, and as such they are more resilient than large scale technologies. These characteristics are likely to become increasingly important in a rapidly changing energy system, and prioritising those technologies that demonstrate resilience, flexibility and adaptability will better enable a transition that is rapid, sustainable, secure and affordable. © 2013 the Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Abstract.
mitchell C, Woodman B, lockwood M, Fitch-Roy O, Steward T, Hoggett R (2014). University of Exeter Energy Policy Group response to the Energy Market Investigation Statement of Issues, submission to the Competition and Markets Authority.
2013
Hoggett RD (2013). Consumer Perspectives on the Future of the UK Gas Network. UKERC– the Future of the UK Gas Network.
Author URL.
Hoggett R, Eyre N, Keay M (2013). Demand and Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Butler C, Darby S, Henfrey T, Hoggett R, Hole N (2013). People and Communities in Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J, Whiting J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Hoggett R (2013). Supply Chains and Energy Security. In Mitchell C, Watson J (Eds.) New Challenges in Energy Security, the UK in a Multipolar World, Palgrave Macmillian.
Lockwood, Matthew, Kuzemko, Caroline, Mitchell, Catherine, Hoggett RD (2013). Theorising governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions.
Abstract:
Theorising governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions
Understanding why and how it is that some countries are able to implement policies which lead to deeper and faster change in sustainable practices and outcomes is an important step in enabling an acceleration in the transition to a sustainable energy future. This paper presents a tentative, provisional framework for analysing energy system transition, differential outcomes and the reasons for them. It suggests that energy system rules (in enabling or blocking change) and incentives (in making change economic or not) play an important role in shaping change. A provisional hypothesis is that the UK’s ability to make the transition to a sustainable energy system is constrained by the nature of its institutional system and policy paradigm; and because of this, a critical precondition for more innovation in the UK is the implementation of an appropriate governance system. A key insight is a need to understand ‘how and why’ policies are implemented, of ‘how and why’ changes in practices and outcomes are driven, and the links between the two. A provisional Theory of Managed Energy Transition is put forward that seeks to: firstly identify the linkages of politics, actors and agency to the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of energy policy implementation and delivery; and secondly, relate these to changes in practice and outcomes.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Lockwood M, Kuzemko C, Mitchell C, Hoggett RD (2013). Theorising governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions, EPG Working Paper 1304.
Abstract:
Theorising governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions, EPG Working Paper 1304.
Understanding why and how it is that some countries are able to implement policies which lead to deeper and faster change in sustainable practices and outcomes is an important step in enabling an acceleration in the transition to a sustainable energy future. This paper presents a tentative, provisional framework for analysing energy system transition, differential outcomes and the reasons for them. It suggests that energy system rules (in enabling or blocking change) and incentives (in making change economic or not) play an important role in shaping change. A provisional hypothesis is that the UK’s ability to make the transition to a sustainable energy system is constrained by the nature of its institutional system and policy paradigm; and because of this, a critical precondition for more innovation in the UK is the implementation of an appropriate governance system. A key insight is a need to understand ‘how and why’ policies are implemented, of ‘how and why’ changes in practices and outcomes are driven, and the links between the two. A provisional Theory of Managed Energy Transition is put forward that seeks to: firstly identify the linkages of politics, actors and agency to the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of energy policy implementation and delivery; and secondly, relate these to changes in practice and outcomes.
Abstract.
Author URL.
Hoggett RD (2013). Understanding Consumer Heat Preferences. UKERC: Low Carbon Heat: Research Gaps & Opportunities.
Author URL.
2012
Hoggett R (2012).
DECC Electricity Demand Data Sources – Summary Note. Sustainability First.
Author URL.
Hoggett R, Ward J, Mitchell C (2012).
Heat in Homes: Fuel and Technology Preferences in the Domestic Sector. Scotia Gas Networks.
Author URL.
2011
Hoggett R (2011).
Funding the Future: the case for a pre-development capital fund for revenue-generating community renewables. A Policy Brief. Author URL.
McGregor P, Hoggett R, Simpson B, Traill Thomson J, Rafferty L (2011). Skills Report: Prospects for Skills in the Environment Sector. Strengthening the Environment Sector.
Hoggett R, Mitchell C, Woodman B, Baker P (2011). The Key Energy Policy Issues for Energy Security in the UK. Which? the Consumer Association.
Hoggett R, Mitchell C, Woodman B (2011).
The Key Energy Policy Issues for Energy Security in the UK: Summary Report. Which? the Consumer Association..
Author URL.
2010
Hoggett R (2010).
At-risk Finance for Community Renewables – research and policy recommendations on the barriers and opportunities for securing at-risk finance for the early stage development of revenue-generating community renewable energy assets. Author URL.
Hoggett RD (2010).
Community-Owned Renewable Energy Projects. Evidence for their development, funding and sustainability. Author URL.
