- Prospective staff
- New staff
- Current staff
- Contact us
- Staff news
- Staff Association
- Benefits, rewards and recognition
- Facilities and activities
- Learning and development
- Staff health and wellbeing
- Employment
- Human Resources
- A-Z of Human Resources policies and employment information
- Codes of conduct
- Employing staff
- Grievance, disciplinary and other dismissal procedures
- Honorary appointments
- Trent HR and management information
- Parents and Carers
- Pay, leave and conditions
- Right to work and immigration
- Staff in academic roles
- Staff who are leaving
- Temporary Staff Bank
- Trade Unions
- Updates and information for staff
- Investor in People (IiP)
- Tell Us staff suggestion scheme
- Services and support
- Documents and policies
- International travel
- External relations
- Term dates
- Web support
- Information management
Ordinance 26: Procedure to be followed by appeal panels
The following procedure shall be followed at appeal hearings in respect of appeals made under the following procedures:
- Disciplinary procedure
- Capability/Performance procedure
- Ill Health/Incapacity procedure
- Redundancy procedure
- Fixed term contract procedure
- Procedure for dismissal on other grounds
1. The University’s representative shall put the case in the presence of the appellant and their representative.
2. The appellant (or their representative) may ask questions of the University’s representative.
3. The appeal panel may ask questions of the University’s representative.
4. The appellant (or their representative) shall put their case in the presence of the University’s representative.
5. The University’s representative may ask questions of the appellant.
6. The appeal panel may ask questions of the appellant.
7. The University’s representative may sum up the University’s case.
8. The appellant (or their representative) may sum up the appellant’s case.
9. The University’s representative and the appellant and their representative shall withdraw.
10. The appeal body shall deliberate in private, but may recall both the University’s representative and the appellant (and their representative) to clear points of uncertainty on evidence already given.
(Note: reference to the University’s representative above includes both the manager who took the formal action under the procedure which is being appealed against and any other person appointed by the University to present the University’s case.)
