**Confidence in Their Ability to Do Mathematics: The Need
to Eradicate Math Anxiety so**

**our Future Students Can Successfully Compete in a High-tech Globally
Competitive World**

Joseph M. Furner

Florida Atlantic University

and

Barbara T. Berman

Contra Costa County Office of Education, California

This article makes the argument for the importance of having one’s confidence with mathematics in order to compete globally in a high-tech world that relies very heavily on mathematics, science, and technology. This article reviews the literature on preventing and reducing math anxiety. In addition, the article is geared toward educators in hopes that they can ultimately excite children about math, encouraging students to be confident in their ability to solve problems, understand mathematical concepts, and see math as a human endeavor. The authors believe that there is a connection between math anxiety and student performance in mathematics. One hopes that as students feel less anxious about, and more confident in, their abilities to do math, their performance on standardized tests will improve, as test scores are often a concern for principals, teachers, and society as a whole. The ideas shared in the article, based on current research on math anxiety, have been applied and shared with teachers and students. Math anxiety has become a growing concern in the United States as well as many other countries around the world. A young person’s ability and confidence to do mathematics is critical for their future success in our high-tech globally competitive world.

Introduction

Often students who are anxious, bored, fearful, or who simply believe that mathematics is unimportant, are likely to avoid the study of mathematics. Mathematics is truly the gateway to engineering and all scientific and technology fields. The shortage of workers in many technical fields is a matter of national concern (Dawson, Internet). Due to the shortage, the U.S. government has given increasing permission to the number of individuals who may enter the country with work visas in technological fields, although the immigration laws have been more stringent since the September 11, 2001 tragedy. Much has been written about the decline of mathematics scores on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and a general weakness in mathematics instruction, the practice of setting higher standards, as well as other reform measures, has not had an appreciable effect. Research about attitudes toward mathematics is important in determining the connection between achievement and math anxiety. It would be beneficial for PreK-16 teachers to develop a better understanding of current issues related to assessment and intervention strategies in order to promote better attitudes toward mathematics among students at all levels. This paper focuses on such issues as math confidence, attitudes, anxiety, assessment, intervention, and best practices/pedagogy.

In today's high-tech world, it is important that our young children grow to become confident in their ability to do mathematics in an ever-increasingly high-tech globally competitive society. This article reviews the literature on preventing and reducing math anxiety. It also shares with the reader, from an educator’s perspective, approaches that could be used to ultimately excite children about math, encouraging students to become more confident in their ability to solve problems, understand mathematical concepts, and see math as a human endeavor. The authors believe that there is a connection between math anxiety and student performance in mathematics. One hopes that as students feel less anxious about and more confident in their abilities to do math, their performance on standardized tests will improve, which is often a concern for principals, teachers, and society at large.

Burns (1998) contends that two thirds of American adults
loathe and fear mathematics. A changing, economically competitive world
has necessitated reform in mathematics education. Dawson (Internet) has
found that Americans often times are not qualified for many high-tech jobs
and that companies seek employees outside the U.S. requiring special H1-B
Visas. Since the September 11^{th} tragedy, this process may be
hampered and the U.S. has no alternative than to better prepare its students
in the areas of math, science, and technology. Dawson (Internet) contends
that our K-12 educational system is not preparing students for future studies
in math and science. Lane (1999) emphasizes the critical importance of
mathematics and science education for our young people and the contribution
they will make to our nation’s economy and overall well-being. Lane (1999)
contends that we must support high quality mathematics and science education
in every way we can so that we are ensured an adequate talent pool for
our country. Lane (1999) refers to the Japanese model of math instruction
where teachers pose problems students have never seen before and they make
connections from what they know to solve and develop skills, the Japanese
in general posses a resilience toward solving problems and not giving up,
the kind of group think and problem solving that typifies the Japanese
approach to learning math is also important in the advancement of technology
and the sciences. Much of the research conducted by the Board of Directors
of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in the mid-1980s
indicated that the mathematics curricula for elementary and secondary schools
in the United States could be more effective. NCTM's response to the need
for change was the publication of *Curriculum and Evaluation Standards
for School Mathematics *(Standards) in 1989. The NCTM suggested that
standards would improve nationwide test scores in the area of mathematics. The
NCTM *Standards* were established as a broad framework to guide reform
in school mathematics (NCTM, 1989 and 2000), not as a specific mathematics
curriculum. The NCTM's vision includes mathematics teachers encouraging
students, probing for ideas, and carefully judging the maturity of a students’ thoughts
and expressions (NCTM, 1989). Most often, current teaching practices in
mathematics classrooms do not provide sufficient critical thought needed
to compete in an ever-advancing technological age. The need for implementation
of the *Standards* is essential. Often, teachers tend to teach the
way they were taught. Sarason (1993) maintained that any reform in education
must first begin with teacher training. Practicing mathematics teachers
and preservice teachers, thus, need to be trained to implement these standards.
Mathematics anxiety in students has become a concern for our society. Evidence
of students’ poor attitudes and high levels of anxiety toward math is abundant. In
the midst of a technological era, declining mathematics (math) scores on
the Scholastic Aptitude Test have been widely publicized along with the
poor middle school and high school scores on the Third International Mathematics
and Science Study. Golberg and Harvey (1983) reported that American students
ranked last when compared with students from all other industrialized countries
on 19 different assessments.

According
to Callahan, Tomlinson, Reis, and Kaplan (2000), "U.S. 12^{th}-graders
who were taking Advanced Placement calculus, when compared with *all *advanced
mathematics students in other nations, performed only at the international
average and significantly higher than students in just five other countries." Steen
(1999) points out "national and international studies show that most
U.S. students leave high school with far below even minimum expectations
for mathematical and quantitative literacy." Neunzert (2000) believes
we have to understand ourselves as MINT-professionals, where MINT is M=mathematics,
I=informatics, N=natural sciences, T=technology. Neunzert (2000) feels
that mathematics is critical for people living in the 21^{st} Century
for them to be successful. Neunzert believes we need to encourage our
students in all countries to study more mathematics and to see it as a
tool for success in life.

Gallup (1983) found that the American public rated math first in importance when compared with the other academic fields. Educators, parents, politicians, and others are trying to assess the cause for the apparent academic weakness in mathematics, and solutions to the problem are being sought.

NCTM (2000) recently published a revised version of standards for teaching mathematics. Included are a list of the following six principles:

1. Equity----high expectations for ALL students;

2. Curriculum-----coherent and articulated for grades Kindergarten through
12;^{ }

3. Teaching----using effective pedagogy that takes into consideration what students know and what they need to learn;

4. Learning for understanding and incorporating prior knowledge;

5. Assessment----designed to support learning and give information to teachers and learners;

6. Technology----consideration of what is taught and how it can enhance learning

In addition, NCTM (2000) recommends the following 10 standards for grades Pre-Kindergarten through 12:

__Content Standards__:

· Numbers and Operations

· Algebra

· Geometry

· Measurement

· Data Analysis and Probability

__Process Standards__ (all of which highlight
ways of acquiring and using content knowledge):

· Problem Solving

· Reasoning and Proof

· Communication

· Connections

· Representations

According to Zemelman (1998), the role of the principal and/or other school administration are extremely important in helping to implement best practices for teaching mathematics. Zemelman suggests that principals do the following in order to overcome math anxiety among students:

1. Play the leading role in promoting best practices by setting the tone for the school with teachers, students, and parents;

2. Distribute copies of the NCTM standards and any other pertinent local, state or regional standards documents in order to educate the principal and his/her staff;

3. Hold Family Math Nights to educate parents;

4. Include in the budget monies for professional development;

5. Encourage the use of math manipulatives and supplies;

6. Encourage teachers to use a variety of assessment methods;

7. Encourage teachers to share and network with each other regarding ideas that work for them, as well as provide in-service workshops for colleagues.

One principal states, “My job as a principal is to see that every child gets the best education possible. I feel it is safe to say that reading and mathematics achievement are two of the primary academic concerns a principal has. It is then important that teachers and parents are equipped with the tools for successful performance of their students. One issue that impedes success in mathematics is the level of students’ math anxiety. If teachers can help to reduce and prevent math anxiety then students will more likely find more success and develop more confidence in their ability to do math.”

One task a principal has is getting teachers to work more effectively
when teaching math and to ensuring that faculty members are on the "same
page" as far as what "best practice" is in mathematics instruction. Teachers
need to know about the NCTM *Standards *and current research in mathematics
education. It is important that teachers recognize the distinction between
preventing math anxiety and reducing math anxiety. Ideally, if teachers
can prevent math anxiety from the onset, then the need of educators to
deal with the task of reducing math anxiety will decrease. Teachers need
to prevent math anxiety from ever happening. However, teachers still
need to get a feel for their students' dispositions toward mathematics. If
math anxiety exists, then it is the teacher's obligation to help his/her
students overcome such anxiety toward math.NCTM Standard #10

Mathematics anxiety has been a prevalent concern among educators and others in our society for decades. Now, with the advent of computer technology, the need for the understanding of mathematics is critical. Teachers can play an important role in reducing the level of mathematics anxiety among their students. McLeod (1991) claims that affective factors play a central role in mathematics learning and instruction. There are many components of mathematics anxiety, such as math test anxiety, number anxiety, and math course anxiety.

One of the authors was the secondary principal of Colegio Interamericano, a bilingual school, in Guatemala City, Guatemala. She found math anxiety to be a rampant problem at the school. She and the Head of the Math Department translated the NCTM Standards into Spanish, and distributed them to the members of the math department. The principal requested budgetary allowances for professional development, but, unfortunately, monies were not available. Instead, she tapped the resources of her staff, inviting them to provide workshops for their colleagues. In addition, she sent teachers to local workshops that were provided on occasion for no fee. She even enticed a Mathematics Education professor, on vacation in Guatemala, to come to the school to offer a workshop on Math Anxiety. The professor was provided with lunch, a complimentary letter of appreciation, and the experience of sharing his knowledge with teachers who were willing to learn.

The aforementioned author, in a second position as the Pre- K-12 principal of Colegio Maya, an international school in Guatemala City, Guatemala, encountered as one of her first responsibilities the task of hiring a new secondary math teacher. It is essential to hire an individual who is committed to adhering to the NCTM Standards, incorporates writing into the math curriculum, encourages students to think critically, utilizes alternative forms of assessment, and is willing to work with math teachers in the elementary and middle school programs to work toward articulating the curriculum. In this way, math anxiety can be alleviated.

Causes of math anxiety, according to Hackett (1985), varied from socioeconomic status and parental background to the influence of teachers and the school system. Kutner (1992) asserted that teachers and parents who were afraid of math could pass on math anxiety to the next generation, not genetically, but by modeling behaviors of their own discomfort with the subject. Oberlin (1982) discussed the following teaching techniques as causes of math anxiety: (a) assigning the same work for everyone, (b) covering the book problem by problem, (c) giving written work everyday, (d) insisting on only one correct way to complete a problem, and (e) assigning math problems as punishment for misbehavior. Brush (1981) contended that the development of math anxiety carried some symptoms that included the following: (a) mathematics became difficult during early years of school, (b) students spent excessive amounts of time relearning what they had been previously taught, and (c) students were not exposed to the everyday applications of the material covered.

-Sequencing pages when creating a webpage or Powerpoint presentation

Teachers need to help kids see math as a human endeavor so that they
learn to value and see application for learning math inside and outside
the classroom. Making such connections may help students realize that
it is not something from which they can escape, but a tool they need to
learn how to use. In the book, *Decartes’ Dream: The World According
to Mathematics *(Davis & Hersch, 1990), the authors discuss how
computers have made mathematics the most important discipline to study. They
take an incisive look at how math is applied in the real world today, particularly
the influence of computers on mathematics, science, and society. Davis & Hersch
(1990) believe all humans are drowning in digits and depend constantly
on math for our high-tech lifestyle. They contend that math is everywhere,
in business, in warfare, and a propaganda tool in social sciences. Dawson
(Internet) cites that fewer Americans are studying math, science, and technology
fields, yet the demand for these fields with technology skills is growing. It
is estimated that by 2008 the top three areas of employment growth will
be in technology fields: computer engineering 108%, computer support specialist
102%, and systems analysts by 94%. If the U.S. cannot produce and attract
sufficient workers from the U.S. in the areas of math, science, and technology
fields they are left with the alternative to seek outside the U.S. for
qualified workers. The U.S. has lead the world in the Information Age. This
success can only continue if we can solve some of the technology labor
shortages and start better preparing our children for the digital world
by allowing them to see math as a human endeavor and a large part of their
future.

Confidence Instead of Anxiety: Preventing Math Anxiety

Research by Sheila Tobias (1993), a leading researcher on the topic of math anxiety, has found that the NCTM Standards: (a) present mathematics as a thinking and decision making tool; (b) direct teachers to teach with concrete materials (c) directs teachers to teach with concrete materials allow students to see that math makes sense in their everyday experiences; and (d) convey that math is first and foremost a language used to organize and communicate valuable information.

Confidence Instead of Anxiety: Reducing Math Anxiety

Best Practice: Practical Ideas for Teachers

Sandra Davis, of the University of Minnesota, has developed the Math Anxiety Bill of Rights:

1. I have the right to learn at my own pace and not feel put down or stupid if I'm slower than someone else;

2. I have the right to ask whatever question I have;

3. I have the right to need extra help;

4. I have the right to ask a teacher for help;

5. I have the right to say I don't understand;

6. I have the right to feel good about myself regardless of my abilities;

7. I have the right not to base my self-worth on my math skills;

8. I have the right to view myself as capable of learning math;

9. I have the right to evaluate my math instructors and how they teach;

10. I have the right to relax;

11. I have the right to be treated as a competent person;

12. I have the right to dislike math;

13. I have the right to define success in my own terms

Become acquainted with good math instruction
as well as study techniques __Mathitude__

Journal writing in math classrooms
has become an everyday event for many students. Students use journals
to express their understanding of mathematical concepts. Journals can also
be used to allow students to share their feelings about and experiences
with math. Students are rarely asked how they feel about learning different
concepts and branches of mathematics. Teachers can really have a better
understanding and feel for any frustration students are feeling. The
following sample list of journal/discussion questions may be used for students
to write about alone or to discuss and share with each other as a class. Teachers
must realize that for students to overcome or reduce their math anxiety,
they must first initiate the journal writing form of therapy by allowing
students to express their true feeling about math and how they arrived
at such a disposition.

*Math Curse *suggests
several ideas, such as:* *math surrounds us, everything in life is
a problem (many involve math), we cannot escape math, there is real value
in and real-life applications for math, it is important to become confident
in one’s ability to do math, math has beauty, math has patterns, math is
a tool, math is a language, and, lastly, math has many uses. Teachers
may want to use *Math Curse *to conduct a bibliotherapy session with
students so that they can relate to the character. This activity can serve
as a lead-in to prompt students to discuss their own feelings about math.

Another practical idea for teachers is to actually teach test taking and study skills. Teachers can easily incorporate and often have include in their teaching some of the following tips:

__Test-Taking/Study Skills__

Martinez and Martinez (1996) have developed the characteristics of Fearless Math Learning. These include:

· Learning by concept;

· Flexible conditions;

· Multimethod problem solving;

· Emphasis on problem solving;

· Many theory testing;

· Positive motivation;

· High expectations;

· Negotiation of goals;

· "Something is better than nothing" thinking;

· Maximum involvement and active learning;

· Shared ownership of information;

· Learning of content; and

· Creativity

Kathy Acker developed the Math Anxiety Code of Responsibilities, which include:

1. I have the responsibility to attend all classes and do all homework as assigned;

2. I have the responsibility to recognize the rights of others to learn at their own pace;

3. I have the responsibility to seek extra help when necessary;

4. I have the responsibility to see the teacher during office hours or to schedule an appointment for assistance;

5. I have the responsibility to come to class prepared, with my homework finished and/or questions to ask;

6. I have the responsibility to speak when I don't understand;

7. I have the responsibility to give math at least the same effort I give to other subjects;

8. I have the responsibility to begin my math study at my current skill level;

9. I have the responsibility for my attitudes about my abilities;

10. I have the responsibility to learn about instructors prior to registering for class;

11. I have the responsibility for learning and practicing relaxation skills;

12. I have the responsibility to act as a competent adult;

13. I have the responsibility to approach math with an open mind rather than fighting it; and

14. I have the responsibility to be realistic about my goals and expectations.

Confidence Instead of Anxiety: Math Testing Anxiety

The Need to Win by Chuang Tzu

Often it appears that there is a vicious cycle of test anxiety. Many times superintendents place pressure on principals, who then may place pressure on teachers to have their students perform well on standardized tests in mathematics. Teachers in turn spend a great deal of time having their students take pretests in preparation for the standardized test. Day in and day out teachers send messages to students stressing the importance of the class as a whole doing well on the test. This leads to a great deal of pressure for students. Often the purpose or focus of why this test is important is lost or never understood by students.

Best Practice: Problem Solving

Currently in math there is more of a focus on process and problem solving as opposed to single answers and computation. Teachers can incorporate more problem solving approaches to instruction as well as rubrics that grade based on the process rather than right answers only. Reys (1998) and NCTM (1995b & 1989) suggest that teachers need to see that methods and tasks for assessing students' learning should be aligned with the curriculum's goals, math content, instructional approaches, and activities including the use of calculators and manipulatives. Reys (1998) and NCTM (1995b & 1989) feel that assessment should allow for multiple sources of information with tasks that show different kinds of math thinking as well as present the same math concept or procedure in different contexts, formats, and problem situations. Also, appropriate assessment methods and uses need to be taken into consideration based on the type of information sought, how the information will be used, and the developmental level and maturity of each student. Teachers need to employ alternative forms of assessment in math classes, as suggested by Reys (1998), such as: observations, questioning, interviews, performance tasks, self-assessments of students, work samples, portfolios, writing samples, paper and pencil tests, and standardized tests. Schools really need to shift toward assessing students' full mathematical power by giving students multiple opportunities to demonstrate their full mathematical understanding, aligning assessment with curriculum and instruction, and regarding assessment as continual and recursive (NCTM, 1995). Teachers need to emphasize more communication in the classroom through discussion, problem solving, discourse, and writing. Teachers benefit children most when they encourage them to share their thinking process and justify their answers out loud as they perform math operations. Currently in Florida, with the new Sunshine State Standards, students at the fifth, eighth, and tenth grade levels will be required to take the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT), which really emphasizes more thought process, with both long and short response types of questions. The FCAT focuses on problem solving; tests number sense, measurement, geometry, algebraic thinking and data analysis; includes long and short responses focusing on process; has guided responses with little room for guessing; raises standards with a focus on long-term outcomes; and offers a process which uses reports to improve schools. Teachers do students a huge favor when they encourage students to discuss, explain, and justify their thinking aloud or in writing for purposes of sharing, since more and more of the standardized tests (FCAT in Florida) are geared toward this form of responding to items (long and short-response questions). With less of an emphasis on right or wrong and more of an emphasis on process, teachers can thus help to create a population of students who no longer fear math tests and may no longer fear math.

Confidence Instead of Anxiety: A Teachers’ own Math Anxiety

Teachers' own math anxiety can interfere with and often create math anxiety for their students. To paraphrase a Chinese proverb (W. V. Williams, 1988, p.103):

It is important that all teachers are consistent in terms of having a knowledge base for teaching mathematics. Teachers not only need to come to terms with their own math anxiety, but also need to be familiar with best practices for teaching mathematics as well as incorporate national and state standards into their instruction. Taking refresher courses/workshops on new research-based best practices for teaching mathematics is critical in a world where technology is quickly changing what and how math is taught. It is also important that students from one teacher to the next receive consistent instruction in mathematics and all teachers prevent the occurrence of math anxiety as each student progresses from one grade to the next.

**Best Practice: Getting Beyond Myths**

Teachers' own anxieties and misconceptions about math instruction must be addressed and corrected. Teachers can often damage their students' own dispositions toward and confidence in their ability to excel at math, even though this is not these educators' intention.

**Confidence Instead of Anxiety: Family
Math**

Parental involvement and a parent's role in changing attitudes toward math are important. Parents need to take a proactive role in the education of their children. Schools can involve parents by encouraging parents to come into the classroom, be involved in the PTA, and invite families to family nights that allow teachers, children and parents to learn together. Family Math Nights (Stenmark, Thompson, Cossey, & Hill, 1986) are becoming a popular means of bringing families to school so a family can do math together. Family math nights can help parents learn about and what students are learning in mathematics as well is how teachers are teaching this subject. Parents can learn about the new math standards, math manipulatives, problem solving and active approaches to learning math. By involving parents in their children's' math education, parents can then better support and see what is valued in today's classrooms. Parent involvement in schools has drastically improved student success.

**Best Practice for Parents**

1.) Let your children know that you believe they can succeed at math.

2.) Be ready to talk to your children about math and to listen to what they are saying or feeling.

3.) Be more concerned with the process of doing math rather than getting the correct answer.

4.) Try not to tell your children how to solve problems; it may be best to ask questions and guide them to the process.

5.) Practice estimation with children whenever possible (i.e. in a store or on a trip)

6.) Provide a special place for study, allowing for the child's learning style to be used.

7.) Encourage group study.

8.) Expect that homework will be done.

9.) Don't expect that all homework will be easy; don't rush your child.

10). Seek out positive ways to support your child's teacher and school.

Parents really play a critical role in helping to build their childrens' confidence in mathematics. It is important that parents work closely with their children's teachers by asking their child's math teacher for a schedule of math topics to be taught. Parents should try to follow their child's progress through his or her math book, tests, and homework. Parents also need to encourage their child to concentrate positively, especially if their child is insecure about his or her math abilities. Parents can help to make a difference in a child's attitude toward math.

Professor Freedman provides math help at: http://www.mathpower.com/. Many math concepts can be taught in a variety of ways. On the Internet, students, teachers, and parents can access the Math Teacher's Ten Commandments, the Math Anxiety Self-Test, Ten Ways to Reduce Anxiety, Students' Math Bill of Rights, Study Skills Tips, Math Anxiety Code of Responsibilities, and many other links to math help. Many sites also can help teachers plan interactive Internet field trips (Ameis & Ebenezer, 2000; Furner, Doan-Holbein, & Scullion-Jackson, 2000) for their students like www.funbrain.com or www.funschool.com.

Although many factors
inside and outside of school influence students’ level of achievement,
the quality of classroom teaching is a key to improving students’ learning
(National Commission on Mathematics ad Science Teaching for the 21^{st} Century,
2000). Much of mathematics is taught through working on mathematics problems
(TIMSS Video Mathematics Research Group, 2003). This similarity probably
can be explained by a convergence of global institutional trends (LeTendre
et al, 2001). The appropriate relationship of school mathematics to life
outside the classroom has been discussed for some time (Stanic and Kilpatrick,
1988). As Furner (1996) has pointed out, making the relationship between
mathematics and life is a way to reduce math anxiety. When anxiety is
reduced, students can become more successful at math, and be better equipped
to be successful in a world that is highly technologically and mathematically
oriented. Many mathematics educators advocate the use of real-life contexts
in mathematics classrooms (Lesh and Lamon, 1992). According to Stigler
and Hibert (1997), the U.S. had not large-scale mechanism for sustained
teacher learning at the time. Although this is still the case, there is
a growing sense that long-term, continuing teacher learning is a key to
improving practice (Darling-Hammond and Sykes, 1999). Improved practice
leads to improved situations for students to feel less anxious about math. As
a result, with a decrease in math anxiety, students will be better prepared,
in terms of their math scales, to experience success in a technological
and mathematical world.

Summary

If we as educators do something about helping our students develop their confidence and ability to do math, we will impact their lives in a positive way forever. Our students’ careers, and ultimately most of their decisions in life, could rest upon how we decide to teach math. It really is our obligation as an educational community to make the difference for the future of our students in an ever-growing competitive global environment, which depends so heavily on mathematics (Furner, 1998). If schools do more in terms of addressing student dispositions toward math, educators may see a correlation with student achievement in mathematics. Educators can play an instrumental role in fostering an environment focusing on numeracy, as well as working toward the prevention of math anxiety so that students will not face such feelings of inadequacy and lack of confidence when working with mathematical ideas. Therefore, in overcoming a major obstacle to the improvement of student mathematics performance, schools may want to begin considering how they can first begin to prevent and reduce math anxiety and address poor dispositions toward mathematics. By utilizing "best practices" in mathematics instruction and addressing math attitudes, educators can then begin to see greater gains in math achievement among their students; hence, eradicating such math anxiety. Students who feel more confident in their ability to do math will hopefully bode them well in all decisions they may make in their lives as well as help them to function and compete in our ever advancing high-tech world we live in. In the future, when asking our students how they feel about math, we will hope they will say: "I love math" or "It was my favorite subject" or " I am good at problem solving."

Acker, K. (n.d.). *Math Anxiety Code of Responsibilities*. Retrieved February 24, 2004, from http://www.mathpower.com/

Ameis, J. A. & Ebenezer, J. V. (2000). *Mathematics
on the internet: A resource for K-12 teachers. * Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Merrill an imprint of Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Anton, W. D., & Klisch, M. C. (1995). Perspectives
on mathematics anxiety and test anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger, & P.
Vagg (Eds.), *Test anxiety*. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis
Publishers.

Arem, C. A. (1993). *Conquering math anxiety*. Pacific Grove,
CA: Brooks/Cole.

Bernstein, J. D. (1992). Barriers to women entering
the workforce: Math anxiety*. New Jersey Equity Research Bulletin *No.
3.

Brush, L. R. (1981). Some thoughts for teachers on mathematics anxiety. *Arithmetic
Teacher, *29*(4 )*, 37-39.

Buckley, P. A., & Ribordy,
S. C. (1982). *Mathematics anxiety and the effects of evaluative instructions
on math performance.* Paper presented at the Mid-western Psychological
Association, Minneapolis, MN, May 6-8, 1982.

Burns, M. (1998). *Math: Facing an American phobia*. Sausalito,
CA: Math Solutions Publications.

Callahan, C.M., Tomlinson, C. A., Reis, S. N., & Kaplan, S. N. (2000). TIMSS
and high-ability students: Message of doom or opportunity of reflection? *Phi
Delta Kappan*, 81(10), 787-790.

Crawford, C. G. (1980*). Math without fear*. New
York: New Visionpoints/Vision Books.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G., eds. (1999). *Teaching
as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. *San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Davis, P. J., & Hersch, R. (1990). *Descartes’ dream:
The world according to mathematics.* London, England: Penguin Publishing
Group.

Davis, Sandra. (n.d.). The Math Anxiety Bill of Rights. Retrieved February 24, 2004, from http://www.mathpower.com/

Davidson, R., & Levitov, E. (1993). *Overcoming math anxiety*. New
York: HarperCollins.

Dawson, R. (n.d.). *Setting the record straight on H1 visa legislation. *An
Opinion Piece by the Information Technology Industry Council. Retrieved
February 24,

http://www.itic.org/policy/h1b_000628.html

Edge, D., & Freedman, E. (1992). Math Teacher's Ten Commandments. Retrieved February 24, 2004, from http://www.mathpower.com/

Professor Freedman Math Help. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2004 from http://www.mathpower.com/

Furner, J. M., Doan-Holbein, M. F., & Scullion-Jackson, K. (2000). Taking
an internet field trip: Promoting cultural and historical diversity through
mayan mathematics. *TechTrends*, 44,(6), 18-22.

Furner, J. M. (1998). Developing positive dispositions toward mathematics:
A teacher’s obligation. *Dimensions in Mathematics, *18*(1)*,
28-31.

Furner, J. M. (1996*). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs
about using the National Council of teachers of Mathematics Standards
and the relationship of these beliefs to students’ anxiety toward mathematics*.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Alabama.

Gallup, G. H. (1983). The 15th annual Gallup poll of
the public attitude toward the public schools*. Phi Delta Kappan*,
September 1983. Report in Shultz, *Education 84/85*. Guilford, CT:
Duahkin, 26-34.

Goldberg, M., & Harvey, J. (1983). A nation at risk: The report
of the national commission on excellence in Education*. Phi Delta Kappan*,
September 1983. Report in Schultz, *Education 84/85*. Guildford,
CT: Pushkin, 1985, 74-74.

Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice
of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis*. Journal
of Counseling Psychology, 32*(1), 47-56.

Hackworth, R. D. (1992). *Math anxiety reduction*. Clearwater,
FL: H & H Publishing Company.

Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics
anxiety*. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, *33-46.

Hendel, D. D., & Davis, S. O. (1978). Effectiveness of an intervention
strategy for reducing mathematics anxiety*. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
25,* 429-434.

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences
in mathematics performance*. Psych Bull, 107*, 139-155.

Kogelman, S. & Warren, J. (1978*). Mind over
math.* New York, NY: Dial Press.

Kutner, L. (1992, August 13). Teachers and parents who
are afraid of math can pass that anxiety to the next generation. *The
New York Times*__,__ pp. B4, C12.

Jackson, C. D, & Leffingwell, R.J, (1999). The role
of instructors in creating math anxiety in students from kindergarten through
college. *The Mathematics Teacher, *92*(7)*, 583-586.

Lane, N. (1999). *International mathematical olympiad
2001 USA. * Paper presented at the Secretary’s Conference Room of
the U.S. Department of Education. September 27, 1999. Found on the Internet
at: http://www.ostp.gov/html/0022_3.html

Lesh, R., & Lamon, S., eds. (1992), *Assessment of
Authentic Performance in School Mathematics. *Washington, D.C.: American
Association for the Advancement of Science.

LeTendre, G. K. et al. (2001). Teachers’ work: Institutional
isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. *Educational
Researcher*, August / September, pp. 3-15.

Martinez & Martinez. (1996). *Math without fear: A
guide for preventing math anxiety in children.* Needleham Heights,
MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Marzano, R. J. (1992). *A different kind of classroom:
Teaching with dimensions of learning.* Alexandria, VA: Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

McLeod, D. B. (1991). Research on learning and instruction in mathematics:
The role of affect. In E. Fennema, T. Carpenter, & S. Lamon (Eds*.),
Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics *(pp. 55-82). Albany,
New York: State University of New York Press.

National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching
for the 21^{st} Century. (2000). *Before It’s Too Late*.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989*). Curriculum
and evaluation standards for school mathematics.* Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995a*). Mathematics
anxiety* [Supplemental Brochure]. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995b*). Professional
assessment standards for teaching mathematics.* Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). *Principles
and Standards for School Mathematics*. NCTM: Reston, VA.

National Resource Council. (1989*). Everybody counts: A report
to the nation on the future of mathematics education. * Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.

Neunzert, H. (2000). *Will
Mathematics and the Mathematicians be able to contribute essentially
in shaping the future? *Paper presentation at the *3ECM Conference
Round Table Discussion on Shaping the 21st Century, Barcelona, Spain,
July 11-14, 2000.*

Oberlin, L. (1982). How to teach children to hate mathematics. *School
Science and Mathematics, 82*, 261.

Reys, R.E., Suydam, M. N., Lindquist, M. N., & Smith, N. L. (1998). *Helping
children learn mathematics*. (Fifth Edition) Boston, MA: Allyn and
Bacon.

Reilly, L. (1992). *Study to examine math anxiety for students
who are single parents and those enrolled in nontraditional career preparation
programs.* (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 380)

Sarason, I. G. (1987). Test anxiety, cognitive interference, and
performance. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), *Aptitude, learning,
and instruction: Volume 3: Conative and affective process analyses* (pp.
131-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sarason, S. (1993*). The case for change*. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey‑Bass Publishers.

Saxe, G. B. (1991). *Culture
and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding*.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schmidt, W. H. (1998). *Changing mathematics in the U.S.: policy
implications from the third international mathematics and science study. *Presentation
at the 76^{th} Annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers
of Mathematics, Washington, D.C., April 3, 1998.

Schneider, W. J. & Nevid, J. S. (1993).
Overcoming math anxiety: A comparison of stress inoculation training and
systematic desensitization*. Journal of College Student Development,
3*(4), 283 ‑ 288.

Scieszka, J., & Smith, L. (1995). *Math curse*. NY,New
York: Viking.

Scribner, J.
(1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), *Everyday
cognition: Its development in social context *(pp. 9-40). Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.

Stanic, G.M.A., & Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Historical
perspectives on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum in Randall
I. Charles and Edward A. Silver, eds. *The Teaching and Assessing of
Mathematical Problem Solving. *Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers
of Mathematics, pp. 1-22.

Steen, L.A. (1999). Numeracy: The new literacy for a data-drenched
society. *Educational Leadership*, October, 8-13.

Stenmark, J.K., Thompson, V., Cossey, R., & Hill,
M. (1986). *Family Math*. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science,
University of California.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding
and improving classroom mathematics instruction. *Phi Delta Kappan*,
September, pp. 14-21.

TIMSS Video Mathematics Research Group. (2003). Understanding
and improving mathematics teaching: Highlights from the TIMSS 1999 video
study. *Phi Delta Kappan*, *84*(10), 768-779.

Tobias, S. (1987). *Succeed with math: Every student's guide to
conquering math anxiety.* New York: College Board Publications.

Tobias, S. (1993). *Overcoming math anxiety revised and expanded*. New
York: Norton.

Trent, R. M. (1985). *Hypnotherapeutic
restructuring and systematic desensitization as treatment for mathematics
anxiety*. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Southwestern
Psychological Association, Austin, Texas.

Wells, D. (1994). Anxiety, insight and appreciation*. Mathematics
Teaching, 147*, 8.

Williams, W. V. (1988). Answers to questions about math anxiety*. School
Science and Mathematics, 88*(2), 95-104.

Zemelman,
S., Daniels, H., and Hyde, A. (1998*). Best practice: New standards
for teaching and learning in America’s schoo*l (2^{nd} Edition)*. *Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann*. *

Appendix A: A Summary of Math Anxiety

__What NCTM says about
Mathematics Anxiety and Dispositions Toward Mathematics……………………..__

**Standard 10: Mathematical Disposition**

As mathematics teachers it is our job to assess students’ mathematical disposition

regarding:

-confidence in using math to solve problems, communicate ideas, and reason;

-flexibility in exploring mathematical idea and trying a variety of methods when

solving;

-willingness to persevere in mathematical tasks;

-interests, curiosity, and inventiveness in doing math;

-ability to reflect and monitor their own thinking and performance while doing

math;

-value and appreciate math for its real-life application, connections to other

disciplines and cultures and as a tool and language.

__How to Reduce Math Anxiety:
A Summation__

1. Psychological Techniques like anxiety management, desensitization, counseling,

support groups, bibliotherapy, and classroom discussions.

2. Once a student feels less fearful about math he/she may build their confidence by

taking more mathematics classes.

3. Most research shows that until a person with math anxiety has confronted this anxiety

by some form of discussion/counseling no “best practice” in math will help to

overcome this fear.

__How to Prevent Math Anxiety:
A Summation__

1. Using “Best Practices” in mathematics such as: math manipulatives, cooperative

groups, discussion of math, questioning and making conjectures, justification of thinking, writing about math, problem-solving approach to instruction, content integration, technology, assessment as an integral part of instruction, etc.

2. Incorporating the NCTM *Standards* and
State Standards into curriculum and

instruction.

3. Discussing feelings, attitudes, and appreciation for mathematics with students regularly is critical.