Research Project - Literature
Module title | Research Project - Literature |
---|---|
Module code | HPDM043 |
Academic year | 2021/2 |
Credits | 30 |
Module staff | Dr Jess Tyrrell (Convenor) |
Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Duration: Weeks | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Number students taking module (anticipated) | 20 |
---|
Module description
The aim of this module is for you to build on your previous knowledge, skills and experience of conducting research by undertaking a medical genomics research dissertation. The dissertation will demonstrate originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in a specialism of healthcare science. The research project will be designed to take into account the research training required by you and the needs of the department in which you will be conducting your research. Your research dissertation will be presented in the form of an in depth literature based review on a specific subject e.g. cardiovascular genomics or epigenetics.
Module aims - intentions of the module
You will use both the theoretical knowledge you will acquire, throughout the taught part of the course, and the analytical skills you will develop in order to participate in research independently. Undertaking of the research dissertation will involve formulating the research question, analysing published data, presenting results and providing a discussion of the results. The project could be carried out in the hosting NHS laboratory, research department or industry, under joint supervision i.e. involving tutors from both the hosting department and the MSc programme.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Identify a research question and critically evaluate the originality and significance of the research question.
- 2. Interpret, critique and draw conclusions from published data (including analysis of methods and statistical techniques used).
- 3. Prepare a written report that critically engages with the research literature, clearly identifying the strengths and weaknesses of selected sources.
- 4. Present the research project in the format of a typical scientific presentation, at a national or international scientific meeting, responding to audience questions appropriately.
- 5. Present a summary of the research project to specialist, non-specialist and lay audiences seeking feedback on the presentation(s).
- 6. Critically reflect on the research experience and feedback process.
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 7. Justify the rationale for research governance and ethical frameworks when undertaking research or innovation in the NHS.
- 8. Demonstrate ways in which patients and the wider public can be involved in Genomic Medicine research (using your own project or that of others).
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 9. Critically reflect on personal practice and make connections between known and unknown areas, to allow for personal development, adaptation and change.
- 10. Respond to innovation and new technologies and be able to evaluate these in the context of best practice and the need for improved service delivery and/or improved research performance.
- 11. Communicate accurately and effectively with peers, tutors and the public.
Syllabus plan
You will work under the supervision of a member of staff who is able to guide you through the dissertation process.
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
20 | 280 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled learning and teaching | 20 | Dissertation supervision meetings (scheduled by arrangement between individual students and supervisors). Dissertation supervisions may be online if they cannot be face to face. |
Guided independent study | 30 | Online discussion groups and tutorials with programme tutors and/or fellow students |
Guided independent study | 130 | Resource gathering and in depth reading |
Guided independent study | 100 | Preparation and writing of dissertation |
Guided independent study | 20 | Preparation of poster |
Formative assessment
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Feedback and discussion | Monthly | 1-11 | Verbal and written |
Presentation to peers and | Termly | 1-11 | Verbal |
Participation in online discussion forum | Monthly | 1-11 | Written |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
85 | 0 | 15 |
Details of summative assessment
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project report following journal guidelines | 85 | Maximum 5,000 words (dependent on target journal guidance) | 1-11 | Written |
Professionalism component | 5 | No assessment for student to submit, professionalism assessment from supervisor | 1-2, 4, 11 | Written |
Poster presentation | 10 | A3 poster | 1-11 | Written |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Project report following journal guidelines (85%), (maximum 5,000 words, depending on target journal guidance) | Project report following journal guidelines | 1-11 | Typically within 12 weeks of the result |
Professionalism component (5%); No assessment for student to submit, professionalism assessment from supervisor | Remedial meeting with the module convenor and supervisor | 1-11 | Typically within 12 weeks of the result |
Poster presentation (10%), A3 poster | Poster presentation | 1-11 | Typically within 12 weeks of the result |
Re-assessment notes
Re-submission of a revised written assignment should include response to the written feedback provided on first assessment.
Please also refer to the TQA section on Referral/Deferral: http://as.exeter.ac.uk/academic-policy-standards/tqa-manual/aph/consequenceoffailure/
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
-
Project specific reading: as directed by the supervisor.
-
Hart, C. (2002). Doing a Literature Review. London, Sage Publications.
-
Hart, C. (2005). Doing Your Masters Dissertation. London, Sage Publicatios.
-
Lock, D. (2007).The Essentials of Project Management (3rd edition). Aldershot, Gower Publishing
-
Oliver, P. (2004). Writing Your Thesis. London, Sage Publications.
-
Rudestam, K. and Newton, R. (2007). Surviving your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process (3rdedition). London, Sage Publications.
-
Swetnam, D. (2005). How to Plan, Prepare and Present Successful Work (3rd edition). Trowbridge, Cromwell Press Ltd.
ELE – http://vle.exeter.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=6222
Credit value | 30 |
---|---|
Module ECTS | 15 |
Module pre-requisites | None |
Module co-requisites | None |
NQF level (module) | 7 |
Available as distance learning? | No |
Origin date | 01/12/2015 |
Last revision date | 17/05/2021 |