Fundamentals of Research Design
Module title | Fundamentals of Research Design |
---|---|
Module code | HPDM092 |
Academic year | 2021/2 |
Credits | 15 |
Module staff | Professor Julia Frost (Convenor) Professor Rob Anderson (Convenor) |
Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Duration: Weeks | 8 |
Number students taking module (anticipated) | 15 |
---|
Module description
In this compulsory introductory module, you will critically examine and apply the core concepts and models at the heart of health services research, and the main methods and elements of study design that underpin this multidisciplinary and highly applied area of social science. It seeks balanced coverage of: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods; a wide range of disciplinary perspectives; appreciation of the full range of health service and health policy goals (e.g. effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, accessibility, equity); and is based around the key study design choices which all applied social science studies face. It will also cover fundamental considerations in all high quality applied health research, such as: the role of theory; patient and public involvement; data processing and management, and research ethics.
Module aims - intentions of the module
By undertaking this module you will gain critical insights into the diversity of methods and core concepts needed to conduct high quality applied health research. The detailed content and aims (see sections below) are geared to the goal of designing research that not only produces valid and reliable knowledge on important health and health service problems, but research findings which are useful to those working in health or social care and health systems – whether they be health, public health or social care professionals, service or hospital managers, service commissioners or healthy policy makers. You will also be able to practice masters level study skills and writing techniques throughout the module.
The module content and assessments are designed to be of value for people from a wide variety of: academic (e.g. social science, science maths) or professional (e.g. clinician) backgrounds; and from both early career (e.g. recent undergraduates, first year PhD, intercalating medical students) and mid-career stages as professionals. This ensures that the module has appeal and utility for researchers and scientists wanting to learn more about the specific problems, goals and core concepts and methods related to doing research for improving health and social care; and for health professionals and other care or management professionals who want to acquire and apply social research knowledge and skills to the teams, programmes and organisations within which they work.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. To introduce and critically examine the key frameworks and threshold concepts that underpin and justify evaluation and research of health care, health services and health systems.
- 2. To understand the strengths and limitations of three of the main strategies of enquiry in applied health research quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed methods research
- 3. To be able to critically examine the ethical risks, implications and regulations related to collecting, processing, analysing and securely storing data from people in health and care contexts, and know how these risks can be minimised or managed.
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 4. To understand the multidisciplinary field of health services research; and an understanding of how the distinct concepts, theories and methodologies of different applied social sciences enable original and useful knowledge for improving health and social care.
- 5. To know the common steps, choices and processes involved in designing a research study.
- 6. To have a clear understanding of the main study designs for the quantitative evaluation the outcomes of health interventions, and an appreciation of the key study design choices and elements/concepts of study design they are based on.
- 7. To have a clear understanding of the main study designs for the quantitative evaluation the outcomes of health interventions, and an appreciation of the key study design choices and elements/concepts of study design they are based on.
- 8. To understand the importance of and methods for engaging with stakeholders, potential research users and patients and the public when conducting applied health research.
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 9. To understand the importance of and methods for engaging with stakeholders, potential research users and patients and the public when conducting applied health research.
- 10. Undertake study skills and writing at masters level
Syllabus plan
Whilst the module’s precise content may vary from year to year, an example of an overall structure is as follows:
The main (applied social science) sub-disciplines of health services research
Health services and health systems (drivers and contexts, policies and guidelines)
Evidence-based policy and practice
Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods modes of inquiry
Key steps, choices and considerations in designing applied health research
Stakeholder engagement and patient and public involvement in research
Research ethics: assessing and managing risks with people and their data
The following approaches might be applied if necessary due to Covid19: -
- Face-to-face scheduled lectures may be replaced by short pre-recorded videos for each topic (15-20 minutes) and/or brief overview lectures delivered via MS Teams, with learning consolidated by self-directed learning resources and ELE activities. –
- Small-group discussion in tutorials and seminars may be replaced by synchronous group discussion on MS-Teams; or asynchronous online discussion, for example via Yammer or ELE Discussion board –
Workshops involving face-to-face classroom teaching may be replaced by synchronous sessions on MS-Teams; or Asynchronous workshop activities supported with discussion forum
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
42 | 108 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled Learning & Teaching activities | 26 | Synchronous and Asynchronous (pre-recorded) online lectures, seminars, master-classes to enhance learning through consolidation of pre-reading, introduction to key topics, specialist areas and contemporary debates. |
Scheduled Learning & Teaching activities | 10 | Synchronous group discussions (via MS-Teams) where applicable, practical exercises and workshops to foster critical thinking and academic/research skills development with opportunities for peer and tutor feedback if relevant to your mode of study. |
Scheduled Learning & Teaching | 6 | 6 weekly (1 hour) online Q&A sessions by MS-Teams. Flexibility for some to be evening. |
Guided independent study | 64 | Web-based learning; resource gathering and in-depth reading during the period of module delivery |
Guided independent study | 44 | Preparation and writing of assignments. |
Formative assessment
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Shared feedback on understanding and assignment plans | Scheduled Q&A sessions via MS-Teams | 1-10 | Oral* and written** feedback *For those in MS-Teams Q&A session ** summarised in ELE as FAQs |
Oral presentation (on using concepts/methods from a chosen subdiscipline of HSR) | Oral presentation (on using concepts/methods from a chosen subdiscipline of HSR) | 1-10 | Oral feedback in session |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Two glossary entries (long definitions) of key concepts/methods | 20 | 500 words (200-250 each) | 1,3,5-8 | Written feedback |
Written assignment | 80 | 2000 words | 1,3,5-8 | Written feedback |
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Two glossary entries (20%) - re-submission of same task but reflecting feedback | 500 words (200-250 each) | 1,3,5-8 | Typically within six weeks of the result |
Written assignment (80%) re-submission but reflecting feedback | Long written assignment (2,000 words) | 1,3,5-6 | Typically within six weeks of the result |
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
Basic reading:
Williams M. (2016) Key Concepts in The Philosophy of Social Research. Sage Publications, London.
Creswell J W (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed methods approaches. Sage (4th Edition)
Other useful readings:
Catherine Pope & Nicholas Mays (Eds) (2020). Qualitative Research in Health Care. Wiley Blackwell.
Richards, D.A., Rahm Hallberg, I. (eds). (2015). Complex Interventions in Health: an Overview of Research Methods. London, Routledge.
Craig P. et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance:BMJ 2008;337:a1655
NHS National Institute of Health Research. INVOLVE. http://www.invo.org.uk/ (accessed 5th February 2014)
ELE – College to provide hyperlink to appropriate pages
Credit value | 15 |
---|---|
Module ECTS | 7.5 |
Module pre-requisites | None |
Module co-requisites | None |
NQF level (module) | 7 |
Available as distance learning? | Yes |
Origin date | 20/12/2016 |
Last revision date | 10/08/2020 |