Science Communication
| Module title | Science Communication |
|---|---|
| Module code | BIO3082 |
| Academic year | 2019/0 |
| Credits | 15 |
| Module staff | Professor Nicola King (Convenor) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 11 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 100 |
|---|
Module description
This module includes seminars from freelance science journalists and civil servants from the Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology. Through the module you’ll gain an understanding of how science is disseminated to the public, for example via journalists and documentary makers, and also how science is communicated to governments and policy makers. We will examine good and bad strategies for communicating science to various audiences and how science information and misinformation can be used to change public perception. We will also examine the role of a range of media and using case studies look at the approach of the press and the impact on public/government, eg BSE, MMR, swine flu, climate change, obesity. This is a highly interactive and engaging module, in which you will work in groups to produce both written documents and oral presentations, and individually to write a piece of biological journalism.
Module aims - intentions of the module
This module aims to give you an understanding of how science is disseminated to the public via journalists and documentary makers and also how science is communicated to governments, politicians and policy makers. To this end you will examine good and bad strategies for communicating science to various audiences and how science information and misinformation can be used to change public perception. You will examine the role of written press, TV, radio, www, blogs, web 2.0 etc. and using case studies look at the approach of the press and the impact on public/government e.g. BSE, MMR, swine flu, climate change, obesity. The aim is that you will use their reflections on these strategies to write your own article on a current story in Biosciences.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Illustrate and analyse the importance of effective communication of science to the public
- 2. Identify and apply effective communication strategies to produce an article
- 3. Critically evaluate the role of different types of media in the communication of science
- 4. Explain the impact of information and misinformation on the public, governments and policy makers
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. Apply the principles of peer review to journalism, critically analysing both scientific journalism in the public domain and within your peer group
- 6. Effectively communicate complex scientific ideas to a wide range of audiences
- 7. Apply research-informed acquired knowledge and critical understanding from other biosciences modules
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 8. Communicate effectively arguments, evidence and conclusions using written and oral means in a manner appropriate to the intended audience
- 9. Devise and sustain, with little guidance, a logical and reasoned argument with sound, convincing conclusions
- 10. Analyse and evaluate appropriate data with very limited guidance
- 11. Work in a small team and deal proficiently with the issues that teamwork requires (i.e. communication, motivation, decision-making, awareness, responsibility, and management skills, including setting and working to deadlines)
Syllabus plan
Introduction to communication strategies, the importance of effective communication of science for a range of audiences. Role of different media types; video, audio, web 2.0. 10 x student-led seminars. Written media: news and feature articles.
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 130 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 15 | Lectures and journal clubs |
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 5 | Student-led seminars |
| Guided Independent Study | 25 | General reading and research |
| Guided Independent Study | 25 | Research for group POSTNote |
| Guided Independent Study | 25 | Research for group presentation |
| Guided Independent Study | 5 | Research for and writing of the Know your Audience Reflection |
| Guided Independent Study | 50 | Research for and writing of the Scientific Article |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online discussion and support | 11 x 1 hour | 1, 3-4, 7-8, 11 | Written |
| Q&A after group presentations | 4 x 1 hour | 1, 3-4, 7-8 | Oral |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 0 | 50 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POSTnote (short briefing note for the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology outlining a key area of debate) | 20 | 1500 words (group work) | 1, 3-5, 7-11 | Written via BART sheet |
| Film | 20 | 20 minutes | 5, 8, 10-11 | Written, returned via admin office |
| Scientific article | 60 | 1500 words | 2, 5-104, 8-10 | Written via BARTsheet |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| POSTnote | POSTnote | 1, 3-5, 7-11 | August Ref/Def |
| Film | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Scientific article | Scientific article | 2, 5-104, 8-10 | August Ref/Def |
Re-assessment notes
Deferral – if you miss an assessment for certificated reasons judged acceptable by the Mitigation Committee, you will normally be either deferred in the assessment or an extension may be granted. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of deferral will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral – if you have failed the module overall (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 40%) you will be required to submit a further assessment. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of referral will count for 100% of the final mark and will be capped at 40%.
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
- Reading will be from the scientific literature, press and internet, as directed by the student and module coordinator.
Indicative learning resources - Web based and electronic resources
| Credit value | 15 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 7.5 |
| Module pre-requisites | BIO2071 Research Skills and Bioethics or NSC2001 |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 6 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 24/11/2011 |
| Last revision date | 09/03/2018 |


