The Opium War: Britain and the Birth of Modern China, 1839-1842
| Module title | The Opium War: Britain and the Birth of Modern China, 1839-1842 |
|---|---|
| Module code | HIH1406 |
| Academic year | 2019/0 |
| Credits | 15 |
| Module staff | Dr Hao Gao (Lecturer) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 11 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 30 |
|---|
Module description
In 1839, Britain, at the urging of opium traders, went to war with China. After three years, the victorious British imposed the Treaty of Nanjing on the Qing Empire. Within two decades, China would be ‘opened’ to Western traders; territory, including Hong Kong and much of Shanghai, was ceded to Britain; and Europeans and Americans would no longer be subject to local law on Chinese soil. For historians of the British Empire, the Opium War and the series of conflicts with China that followed it marked the beginnings of ‘gunboat diplomacy’: the use of technological superiority to dictate to lesser powers. For Chinese historians, though, the conflict marks a defining moment in the transformation of a multinational empire into a modern nation state.
Module aims - intentions of the module
The aim of the module is to:
- Introduce this crucial moment in China’s past by looking at the causes, course, and consequences of the conflict through both British and Chinese sources
- Assess the nature of China’s encounter with the West and consider the impact of the conflict on modern China
- Compare and contrast conflicting responses to particular events and issues, such as debates over the rights and wrongs of opium trading, and the diplomatic assumptions and practices of the two powers
- Engage in close reading of primary sources (all in translation) and secondary literature
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Assess the nature of Chinas encounter with the West and its impact on modern China
- 2. Work critically with a range of sources related to the Opium War
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 3. Identify the problems of using historical sources, e.g. bias, reliability, etc., and to compare the validity of different sources
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 4. Answer a question briefly and concisely
- 5. Present work and respond to question orally, and think quickly of questions to ask other students
- 6. Conduct independent study and group work, including the presentation of material for group discussion, developed through the mode of learning
- 7. Digest, select and organise material to produce to a deadline a coherent and cogent argument, developed through the mode of assessment.
- 8. Work with others in a team and to interact effectively with tutor and the wider group
- 9. Write to a very tight word-length
Syllabus plan
The module will benefit from the wide range of sources available on the Opium War. From the British side, students will explore travel writing on China, parliamentary debates, newspaper articles, missionary correspondence, and images. From the Chinese side, they will critically evaluate imperial edicts, memoirs and reports. All sources are in English, though the class will consider translation as a historical and historiographical challenge Whilst the content may vary from year to year, it is envisioned that it will cover some or all of the following topics:
- The Treaty of Nanjing alongside subsequent diplomatic agreements
- Who Were the Chinese
- British perceptions before the war
- Chinese world view
- The Problem of Opium
- China: Debates over suppression and legalisation
- Britain: Intervention or non-interference
- Perspectives on the War
- British views
- Chinese views
- Impact
- The ‘unequal treaties’
- Modernisation and self-strengthening
- The ‘Yellow Peril’
- The Opium War in Chinese memory
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | 128 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled learning and teaching | 2 | 2 hour lecture: Introduction to module |
| Scheduled learning and teaching | 20 | 10 x 2 seminars. At a meeting of the whole class generally a different group of 3-4 students will give a presentation to the whole class, followed by class discussion and working through the sources for that week carefully. Additional sources may be issued in the class and the lecturer will also use the time to set up issues for the following week. |
| Guided independent study | 128 | You prepare for the session through reading and research; writing five source commentaries and an essay and preparing one group presentation in the course of the term |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group presentation (3-4 students) | 10-15 minutes | 1-4, 6-7, 9 | Oral |
| Lowest mark from portfolio of 5 source commentaries | 500 words | 1-4, 6-7, 9 | Mark and written comments |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 highest marks from portfolio of 5 source commentaries | 60 | 2000 words (500 per commentary) | 1-5, 7-8, 10 | Mark and written comments |
| Essay on sources | 40 | 1500 words | 1-5, 7-8, 10 | Mark and written comments |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 highest marks from portfolio of 5 source commentaries | 4 highest marks from portfolio of 5 source commentaries | 1-5, 7-8, 10 | Referral/Deferral period |
| 1500 word essay | 1500 word essay | 1-5, 7-8, 10 | Referral/Deferral period |
Re-assessment notes
Deferral – if you miss an assessment for certificated reasons judged acceptable by the Mitigation Committee, you will normally be either deferred in the assessment or an extension may be granted. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of deferral will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral – if you have failed the module overall (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 40%) you will be required to submit a further assessment as necessary. If you are successful on referral, your overall module mark will be capped at 40%.
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
- Baumler, lan. Modern China and Opium : A Reader (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001).
- Brook, Timothy and Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi (eds.). Opium Regimes: China, Britain and Japan, 1839-1952 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).
- Fairbank, John K. Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842-54 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974).
- Fay, Peter Ward. The Opium War, 1840-42 (Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).
- Lovell, Julia. The Opium War: Drugs, Dreams and the Making of China (London: Picador, 2012).
- Spence, Jonathan D. The Search for Modern China (London: W. W. Norton & Co., 2001).
- Wakeman, Frederic. Strangers at the Gate: Social Disorder in South China, 1839-1861 (Berkeley: California University Press, 1966).
- Waley, Arthur. The Opium War Through Chinese Eyes (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979).
- Yangwen, Zheng. The Social Life of Opium in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Indicative learning resources - Web based and electronic resources
| Credit value | 15 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 7.5 |
| Module pre-requisites | None |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 4 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 29/07/2013 |
| Last revision date | 15/07/2014 |


