Democracy in the European Union
| Module title | Democracy in the European Union |
|---|---|
| Module code | POL3196 |
| Academic year | 2020/1 |
| Credits | 30 |
| Module staff | Dr Sandra Kroger (Convenor) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 11 | 11 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 25 |
|---|
Module description
Democracy in and of the European Union (EU) is a key topic in political science. Political representation is a main feature of democracy and takes many forms – parliaments, parties, interest groups, etc. The EU, ever since the passing of the presumed ‘permissive consensus’ in the early 1990s, has tried to accommodate the uneasiness of its many critics in order to democratize itself. However, despite changes within the institutions of the EU designed to enhance its representative legitimacy, the EU still encounters criticisms of a ‘democratic deficit’. This module focuses on the relationship between democracy and the EU by tracking the developments of the different channels of representation within the EU, and their possible interaction – or lack thereof. It will also discuss the issue of the ‘democratic deficit’, particularly in the light of the Euro debt and financial crisis and the upcoming UK referendum on the EU.
Module aims - intentions of the module
This module familiarizes you with core theories, debates and actors of political representation in the EU. It aims at providing you with the skills to engage in current debates on parliaments, parties, interest groups and civil society, and to apply core theories to a range of political phenomena central to this subfield of political science, as well as to critically evaluate the usefulness of these theories. Furthermore, the module familiarizes you with the debate around the democratic deficit of the EU and challenges you to develop your own position on the topic. In doing so, it aims to equip you with the analytical skills required to describe and explain the hybrid system of political representation in the EU. Case studies and a simulation are used to illustrate key issues and challenges. The first part of the module deals with core theoretical debates. The second part focuses on the empirical workings of different actors of political representation in the EU.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. demonstrate understanding of core concepts and approaches regarding democracy, political legitimacy and political representation and their application to the EU context;
- 2. give an account of the main institutions, actors and processes of governance in the EU;
- 3. show theoretical and practical knowledge of the debate on the democratic deficit of the EU;
- 4. critically engage with on-going debates on the democratic deficit and the political legitimacy of the EU;
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. critically evaluate core concepts;
- 6. construct rigorous arguments which show an understanding of key theories;
- 7. deploy theoretical arguments and apply them to empirical case studies in European public policy;
- 8. justify own choices of theory, research design and method with regard to individual research interests and research questions in the field of EU studies;
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 9. critically evaluate ideas and debates;
- 10. write clearly and coherently;
- 11. deploy the ability to communicate clearly and deliver presentations to peers;
- 12. work independently and in collaboration with peers; and
- 13. use IT for the retrieval and presentation of information.
Syllabus plan
This plan is indicative of the topics to be covered by the module. More details will be given and the plan finalized in the module outline.
The module will look at representation theory in a first step before it moves on to address the main actors involved in democratic representation in the EU – the Council of the EU, the European Council, the European Parliament, Europarties, national parliaments, national parties, interest groups and civil society organisation, as well as citizens. We will also look at some current debates and developments such the democratic deficit debate, the debate on democratic backsliding, the Euro crisis, the UK leaving the EU as well as increasing Euroscepticism.
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | 256 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Learning & Teaching activities | 44 | 22 x two-hour seminars. These will be a mix of formal lectures led by the co-ordinator, student presentation and student discussion. The emphasis is on weekly seminar presentations; active seminar participation. |
| Guided independent study | 256 | A variety of private study tasks directed by module leader, including reading at least two articles per class, the reading for the oral presentation and its preparation, the preparation of the simulation, the reading for the essay, the conducting of research for it and the writing of the essay. The large bulk of the independent study time will be spent with the weekly reading of key texts and the research for and drafting of the essay. |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essay plan | Max. of 400 words | 1-10 | Either oral or in writing |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation | 20 | 15 minutes | 1-13 | Written feedback |
| 2 Podcasts in small | 20 | Each podcast 5-10 | 1-13 | Written feedback |
| Essay | 60 | 4,000 words | 1-10 | Written feedback |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation | Presentation (15 minutes) | 1-13 | August/September reassessment period |
| 2 podcasts | Minimum 5 minutes | 1-13 | August/September reassessment period |
| Essay | Essay (4,000 words) | 1-10 | August/September reassessment period |
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
Manin, Bernard, 1997, The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Introduction, Chapter 2, 4-6, Conclusion.
Pitkin, Hanna, 1967, The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scharpf, Fritz, 1999, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: OUP
Richardson, Jeremy and Mazey, Sonja (eds.), 2015, European Union. Power and Policy-Making, 4th edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2002, In Defence of the 'Democratic Deficit': Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 603-24.
Follesdal, Andreas and Simon Hix, 2006, Why there is a Democratic Deficit in the European Union. A Response to Majone and Moravcsik, Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (3): 533-62.
| Credit value | 30 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 15 |
| Module pre-requisites | None |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 6 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 01/06/2015 |
| Last revision date | 24/08/20 |


