Digital Pasts
| Module title | Digital Pasts |
|---|---|
| Module code | ARCM107 |
| Academic year | 2025/6 |
| Credits | 15 |
| Module staff | Dr Carly Ameen (Convenor) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 10 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 15 |
|---|
Module description
Module aims - intentions of the module
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of specific digital techniques currently used in archaeology and history research
- 2. Demonstrate advanced skills in a range of digital analytical methods employed by archaeologists and historians
- 3. Understand the role of digital technologies in analysing and disseminating archaeological and historical data
- 4. Present advanced skills in extracting information from existing digital resources.
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. Demonstrate advanced skills in acquiring, structuring, and analysing digital data
- 6. Apply skills in specific software techniques for creating, querying, and displaying data
- 7. Critically engage with the impact of digital technologies on our understanding of the past
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 8. Present, describe and evaluate complex information
- 9. Acquire a range of sophisticated observational and analytical skills which are applicable in the wider world and for e.g. PGR level research
- 10. Produce highly effective and publication-quality images, graphs and figures
Syllabus plan
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 122 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | 28 | Made up of 10 hours of lecture and live discussion content and 18 hours of guided practical engagement with digital datasets, technologies, and resources |
| Guided Independent Study | 122 | Independent study using computer aided learning, reading, and interaction with digital resources |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution to class discussions and engagement with practical tasks | Attendance and participation in discussions, and in practical sections as appropriate | 2, 4-7, 9 | Oral, in class |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-Project 1 | 34 | 1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures | 1-10 | Mark and written feedback |
| Mini-Project 2 | 33 | 1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures | 1-10 | Mark and written feedback |
| Mini-project 3 | 33 | 1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures | 1-10 | Mark and written feedback |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-Project 1 (1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures) | 1000-word project equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures working with a new dataset. (34%) | 1-10 | Ref-def period |
| Mini-Project 2 (1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures) | 1000-word project equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures working with a new dataset. (33%) | 1-10 | Ref-def period |
| Mini-project 3 (1000-word equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures) | 1000-word project equivalent, including digital outputs, illustrations and figures working with a new dataset. (33%) | 1-10 | Ref-def period |
Re-assessment notes
Where you have been referred/deferred for one of the mini-modules, you will be given an alternative dataset and further practical exercise and required to produce a mini project based on that data, (1000-word equivalent).
Deferral – if you miss an assessment for certificated reasons judged acceptable by the Mitigation Committee, you will normally be either deferred in the assessment or an extension may be granted. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of deferral will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral – if you have failed the module overall (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 50%) you will be required to submit a further assessment as necessary. If you are successful on referral, your overall module mark will be capped at 50%.
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
- Beelen, Kasper, Jon Lawrence, Daniel C.S. Wilson, and David Beavan, ‘Bias and representativeness in digitized newspapers’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (Advance Access, 2022) https://academic.oup.com/dsh/advance-article/doi/10.1093/llc/fqac037/6644524
- Bodenhamer, D. J., J. Corrigan and T. M. Harris (eds), The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship (2010) (chapter 6: G. Lock, ‘Representations of Space and Place in the Humanities’, pp 89-108)
- Cameron, F. The future of digital data, heritage and curation in a more-than human world. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2021.
- Daniel J., Story, Jo Guldi, Tim Hitchcock, Michelle Moravec, History’s Future in the Age of the Internet, The American Historical Review, Volume 125, Issue 4, October 2020, Pages 1337–1346,
- Hitchock, T., ‘Confronting the digital: or how academic history writing lost the plot’, Cultural and Social History, 10 (2012), 9-23
- Hudson, Pat and Mina Ishizu. History by Numbers: An Introduction to Quantitative Approaches. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
- Klein, L.F. & Gold, M.K., eds. 2016. Debates in the Digital Humanities. 2016 Edition. University of Minnesota Press
- Prescott, Andrew., ‘I’d rather be a librarian: a response to Tim Hitchcock, ‘Confronting the digital’’, Cultural and Social History, 11 (2014), 335-41
- Putnam, Laura, ‘The transnational and the tex-searchable: digitized sources and the shadows they cast’, American Historical Review, 121 (2016), 377-402
- Richardson, L., A Digital Public Archaeology?. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, UCL. 2013; 23(1): 10, pp. 1-12
- Vincent, M. L. et al. (eds.) (2018) Heritage and archaeology in the digital age: acquisition, curation, and dissemination of spatial cultural heritage data. Cham, Switzerland: Springer
Indicative learning resources - Web based and electronic resources
- Beelen, Kasper, Jon Lawrence, Daniel C.S. Wilson, and David Beavan, ‘Bias and representativeness in digitized newspapers’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (Advance Access, 2022) https://academic.oup.com/dsh/advance-article/doi/10.1093/llc/fqac037/6644524
- Giannini T, Bowen JP. Museums and Digital Culture: From Reality to Digitality in the Age of COVID-19. Heritage. 2022; 5(1):192-214. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5010011
- https://programminghistorian.org/en/
- https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/
| Credit value | 15 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 7.5 |
| Module pre-requisites | None |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 7 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 15/03/2023 |
| Last revision date | 11/02/2025 |


