Skip to main content

Study information

The Healthcare Leadership Case Study

Module titleThe Healthcare Leadership Case Study
Module codeHPDM192DA
Academic year2024/5
Credits60
Module staff

Dr Susanne Smith (Convenor)

Duration: Term123
Duration: Weeks

26

Number students taking module (anticipated)

48

Module description

The aim of this module is to guide you through the process of producing a research proposal relating to a leadership intervention which you will go on to implement and then write up as your leadership case study.  You will learn about literature searching; selecting an appropriate research methodology; the process of systematically conducting research; the role of reflexivity in qualitative research; and writing a significant report which evaluates your leadership impact. It is expected that aspects of the golden threads of the programme are included in your case study.  Your leadership case study forms the dissertation for this programme. 

Module aims - intentions of the module

It is intended that after completing this module you will understand a range of research methodologies (qualitative and quantitative), ethical principles underpinning research, and how to select an approach in order to provide evidence or gather data for a leadership intervention. Methods of evaluation will also be considered alongside effective and impactful ways of presenting data, findings and conclusions. Once again, the importance of leadership praxis will be discussed, and faculty will support you to develop reflective habits that will sustain you during and beyond this final stage of the programme. It is intended that the learning from the Leadership Case Study will inform individual tutorial discussions and provide useful reflections on your leadership impact and areas for future development.

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

ILO: Module-specific skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 1. Understand, explain and apply ethical principles and practices to your research.
  • 2. Understand different research methodologies and their potential use in framing your case study.
  • 3. Apply knowledge from the programme to plan a rigorous health or care leadership case study.

ILO: Discipline-specific skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 4. Appraise a range of investigative approaches appropriate to leadership and organisational studies.
  • 5. Utilise and critique theories and concepts from the published literature on health and care leadership and management.

ILO: Personal and key skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 6. Develop and refine l skills and knowledge to both implement and evaluate a leadership intervention.
  • 7. Communicate with impact the learning from the case study.

Syllabus plan

Weeks 1-2 – The research process.
Weeks 3-7 – Methodology.
Week 8 – Writing your proposal and healthcare leadership case study.
Weeks 8-20 – Literature review, data collection and analysis.
Weeks 21-26 – Writing-up and submission of the case study.

 

Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)

Scheduled Learning and Teaching ActivitiesGuided independent studyPlacement / study abroad
595410

Details of learning activities and teaching methods

CategoryHours of study timeDescription
Scheduled Learning and Teaching activities59Masterclasses, action learning sets and tutorials
Guided independent study541Guided online materials, self-learning and work-based learning

Formative assessment

Form of assessmentSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Draft research proposal500 words + plan1-5Written and oral
Leadership case study500 words + plan1-7Written and oral

Summative assessment (% of credit)

CourseworkWritten examsPractical exams
10000

Details of summative assessment

Form of assessment% of creditSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Research proposal253,000 words1-7Written
Case study7510,000 words1-7Written

Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)

Original form of assessmentForm of re-assessmentILOs re-assessedTimescale for re-assessment
Research proposal3,000 words (25%)1-7Programme schedule dependent
Case study10,000 words (75%)1-7Programme schedule dependent

Re-assessment notes

All passed components of the module will be rolled forward and will not be reassessed in the event of module failure.

Indicative learning resources - Basic reading

Bell, J. (2014) Doing your research project: a guide for first time researchers. (6th ed.) Maidenhead: McGrawHill Education.

Pertti, A., Bickman, L. and Brannen, J. (2005) The Sage handbook of social research methods. London: Sage Publications.

Etherington, K. (2004) Becoming a reflexive researcher: using ourselves in research. London; Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Bate, P. (2014) Perspectives in context: context is everything. London: The Health Foundation.

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2002) Management research: an introduction. London: Sage Publications.

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2002) Management research: an introduction. London: Sage Publications. pp. 13-26.

Hart, C. (2006) Doing your Masters dissertation. London: Sage Publications. pp. 277-311.

Leithead, A. (2011) Stanford prison experiment continues to shock [online]. Available

at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14564182 [Accessed 1 December 2016].

Watson, T.J. (1994) Managing, crafting and researching: words, skill and imagination in shaping managment research. British Journal of Management, 5(SI): S77-S87.

Ariely, D. (2011) Beware conflicts of interest [online]. Available at: http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_ariely_beware_conflicts_of_interest online [Accessed 9 January 2017].

Ethrington, K. (2004) Becoming a reflexive researcher: using ourselves in research, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp 25-27.

Griffiths, R. (1983) Report of the NHS management inquiry. London: The Stationary Office.

Linstead, S. (1997) The social anthropology of management. British Journal of Management, 8(1): 85-98.

Mahon, A., Walshe, K. and Chambers, N. (2009) A reader in health policy and management. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

RSA Animate (2010) Changing education paradigms [online]. Available at: Play Video [Accessed 9 January 2017].

Strong, P. and Robinson, R. (1990) The NHS under new management. Bristol: Open University Press. pp. 3-9.

White, S., Fook, J. and Gardner, F. (eds.) (2006) Critical reflection in health and social care. Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press. pp. 144-155.

Bruner, J. (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1): 1-21.

Delanty, G. (1997) Social science: beyond constructivism and realism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Doyle, A.C. (1892) The adventures of Sherlock Holmes [online]. Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1661 [Accessed 29 November 2016].

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2002) Management research: an introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. pp. 52-54.

Esping-Anderson, G. (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Freeman, G. and Hughes, J. (2010) Continuity of care and the patient experience. London: The King’s Fund.

Goldacre, B. (2011) Battling bad science [online]. Available at: http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_battling_bad_science [Accessed 30 November 2016].

Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Parry, J. (2003) Making sense of executive sense-making. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 17(4): 240-263

Polkinghorne, D. (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: University of New York Press.

Popper, K.R. (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

Robson, C. (2011) Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 85-93.

Thorpe, R. and Moscarola, J. (1991) Detecting your research strategy. Management Education and Development, 22(2): 127-133.

Zhang, Z. and Spicer, A. (2014) ‘Leader, you first’: the everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy. Human Relations, 67(6): 739-762.

Ahmed, S. (2006) Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. London: Duke University Press. pp. 1-24.

Appleton, J.V. and Cowley, S. (1997) Analysing clinical practice guidelines: a method of documentary analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(5): 1008-1017.

Australian National University (no date) Writing & assessment [online]. Available at: http://www.anu.edu.au/students/learning-development/writing-assessment [Accessed 6 December 2016].

Bar-On, D. and Adwan, S. (2006) 'The psychology of better dialogue between two separate but interdependent narratives', in Rotberg, R.I. (ed.) Israeli and Palestinian narratives of conflict: history's double helix. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press. pp. 206-224.

Bate, S.P. (2004) The role of stories and storytelling in organisational change efforts. London: BMJ Publications.

BBC (no date) The big personality test [online]. Available at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/labuk/experiments/the-big-personality-test [Accessed 7 December 2016].

Beech, N. (2000) Narrative styles of managers and workers: a tale of star-crossed lovers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2): 210-228.

Blaxter, L. (2010) How to research, (4th ed.) Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bloor, M., Frankland, J., and Thomas, M. et al. (2001) Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publications.

Boje, D.M. (1995) Stories of the storytelling organization: a post-modern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land”. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4): 997-1035.

Brewer, J.D. (2002) Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press. pp. 56-103.

University of Bristol (no date) Bristol online surveys [online]. Available at: http://www.survey.bris.ac.uk/ [Accessed 7 December 2016].

Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D. and McGuire, P. (2003) Why action research? Action Research, 1(1): 9-28.

Butler, J. (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4): 519-531.

Check, J. and Schutt, R.K. (2011) Research methods in education. London: Sage Publications. pp. 159-186.

Chestnutt, I.G, and Robson, K.F. (2002) Focus groups: what are they? Dental Update, 28: 189–192.

Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T. (no date) Doing action research in your own organisation [online]. Available at: https://study.sagepub.com/coghlanandbrannick [Accessed 6 December 2016].

Costello, J. (2001) Nursing older dying patients: findings from an ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(1): 59-68.

Cowan, D. (2009) Research issues in health and social care. Keswick: M&K Update Ltd.

Creswell, J.W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design. London: Sage Publications. pp. 69-110

Dan, A. and Kalof, L. (2008) Essentials of social research. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

Dicicco-Bloom, B. and Crabtree, B.F. (2006) The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4): 314-321.

Domino, G. and Domino, M. (2002) Psychological testing: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drake, D.H. (2014) Researching prisoner experiences with prison officers: an action research-inspired approach. Action Research, 12(1): 94-109.

Ethnography Matters (2016) Ethnography Matters [online]. Available at: http://ethnographymatters.net/http://ethnographymatters.net/ [Accessed 6 December 2016].

Fibel, B. and Hale, W.D. (1978) The generalized expectancy for success scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5): 924-931.

Fisher, C. and Anushko, A. (2008) in social science.' In Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. and Brannen, J. (eds.) The Sage handbook of social research methods. London: Sage

University of Bristol (no date) Bristol online surveys [online]. Available at: http://www.survey.bris.ac.uk/ [Accessed 7 December 2016].

 

Indicative learning resources - Web based and electronic resources

Key words search

Leadership, management, research methods, organisational research, research ethics

Credit value60
Module ECTS

30

Module pre-requisites

None

Module co-requisites

None

NQF level (module)

7

Available as distance learning?

No

Origin date

07/10/2024