Skip to main content

Study information

Advanced Clinical Practice Improvement Project

Module titleAdvanced Clinical Practice Improvement Project
Module codeHPDM152
Academic year2023/4
Credits30
Module staff

Dr Amad Al-Azzawi (Convenor)

Duration: Term123
Duration: Weeks

10

10

Number students taking module (anticipated)

20

Module description

This module will provide you with the opportunity to create an action plan for change via a service improvement project. This will allow you to build on your experiences gained in previous modules by focusing on an area of service improvement that is particular to your area of clinical specialism. You may choose to build on your case study presentation submitted in HPDM128 Principles of Advanced Clinical Practice, or you may have a new action plan/project you wish to undertake.

The project will demonstrate originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to carry out a project of enquiry. You will present your project in the form of a change initiative in practice action plan. 

Module aims - intentions of the module

You will use both the theoretical knowledge you will acquire, throughout the taught part of the course, and the analytical skills you will develop to create your action plan.

The aim of this module is:

  • To plan a quality improvement activity in a specific area of practice
  • To develop your academic skills to source and review evidence-based resources
  • To enhance your skills as a reflective practitioner using workplace based significant events.
  • To critically analyse how healthcare outcomes are measured
  • To make links with local healthcare stakeholders and resources
  • To develop your academic writing style that shows critical thinking

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

ILO: Module-specific skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 1. Critically evaluate the range of evidence-based standards and clinical guidelines which underpin the rationale for the quality improvement project in your area of clinical professionalism.
  • 2. Interpret, critique and draw conclusions from published data (including analysis of methods and statistical techniques used) including the impact of policy on health and social care as applicable to your project/research.
  • 3. Explore and evaluate the range of legal, ethical, professional, financial and organisational policies and procedures that may apply to your action plan.
  • 4. Identify and justify the measures and systems which may be utilised when measuring the impact and effectiveness within your action plan.
  • 5. Prepare an evidence-based action plan that critically engages with the research literature and generates practice innovation or explores service redesign solutions in response to service need as applicable to the project.

ILO: Discipline-specific skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 6. Justify the rationale for research governance and ethical frameworks as applicable to your action plan.
  • 7. Demonstrate ways in which patients and the wider public can be involved in healthcare or health services research or quality improvement (using your own action plan or that of others).

ILO: Personal and key skills

On successfully completing the module you will be able to...

  • 8. Critically reflect on personal practice and make connections between known and unknown areas, to allow for personal development, adaptation and change.
  • 9. Communicate your innovation/service improvement accurately and effectively through appropriate media with peers, tutors and the public.

Syllabus plan

Whilst the module’s precise content may vary from year to year, an example of an overall structure is as follows:

  • Source and appraising evidence-based resources
  • Monitoring and evaluating practice
  • Significant event analysis
  • Quality improvement activities
  • Patient public involvement, patient surveys
  • Systems of enquiry and analysis of outcomes, findings or developments
  • Peer disseminating of findings and outcomes; presentation skills and writing for publication

Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)

Scheduled Learning and Teaching ActivitiesGuided independent studyPlacement / study abroad
68232

Details of learning activities and teaching methods

CategoryHours of study timeDescription
Scheduled Learning and Teaching20Lectures/seminars
Scheduled Learning and Teaching20Action plan development meetings (scheduled by arrangement between individual students and supervisors)
Scheduled Learning and Teaching28Online discussion groups and journal club activities with programme tutors and/or fellow students
Guided independent study40E-learning activities
Guided independent study192Reading. Preparation of presentation, writing up of action plan project

Formative assessment

Form of assessmentSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Improvement project plan outline300 – 400 words1-9Oral and written
Article summary500 words1-9Oral and written
Infographic250 words1-9Oral and written

Summative assessment (% of credit)

CourseworkWritten examsPractical exams
80020

Details of summative assessment

Form of assessment% of creditSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Action plan project80Maximum 4,500 words1-9Written
Poster and oral presentation20Oral presentation (15 minutes)1-9Written
0
0
0
0
0

Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)

Original form of assessmentForm of re-assessmentILOs re-assessedTimescale for re-assessment
Action plan project (80%) Maximum 4,500 wordsAction plan project1-9Typically within 6 weeks of mark release
Poster and oral presentation (20%) (15 minutes)Poster and oral presentation 1-9Typically within 6 weeks of mark release

Re-assessment notes

Please refer to the TQA section on Referral/Deferral: http://as.exeter.ac.uk/academic-policy-standards/tqa-manual/aph/consequenceoffailure/

All items of assessment must be passed in order to pass the module. In the event of you failing either of the assessments, the module will be capped at 49 until the assessment is passed.

Re-submission of a revised written assignment should include response to the written feedback provided on first assessment.

If you pass re-assessments taken as a result of deferral, your re-assessment will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment and the overall module mark will not be capped.

If you pass re-assessments taken as a result of referral (i.e. following initial failure in the assessment), the overall module mark will be capped at 50%.

If you fail re-assessments taken as a result of referral (i.e. following initial failure in the assessment), you will be failed in the module.�

Indicative learning resources - Basic reading

Basic reading:

  • Project specific reading: as directed by the supervisor.
  • Hart, C. (2002). Doing a Literature Review. London, Sage Publications.
  • Lock, D. (2007).The Essentials of Project Management (3rd edition). Aldershot, Gower Publishing
  • Swetnam, D. (2005). How to Plan, Prepare and Present Successful Work (3rd edition). Trowbridge, Cromwell Press Ltd

ELE – College to provide hyperlink to appropriate pages

Key words search

Improvement project, action plan, service development, research, audit, evaluation

Credit value30
Module ECTS

15

Module pre-requisites

None

Module co-requisites

None

NQF level (module)

7

Available as distance learning?

No

Origin date

22/11/2021

Last revision date

26/05/2023