Economics and Ethics
| Module title | Economics and Ethics |
|---|---|
| Module code | BEE2030 |
| Academic year | 2024/5 |
| Credits | 15 |
| Module staff | Professor John Maloney (Convenor) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 10 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 120 |
|---|
Module description
All economic policy involves the application of value judgements to positive propositions about the consequences of alternative actions. This module studies economic policy to determine how these value judgements are, and should be, formed. Areas include distribution, international and intergenerational justice, environmental issues affecting future generations, the case for growth, the economics of happiness and the costs and benefits of saving or destroying lives.
The assessment structure on this module is subject to review and may change before the start of the new academic year. Any changes will be clearly communicated to you before the start of term and if you wish to change module as a result of this you can do so in the module change window.
Module aims - intentions of the module
All economic policy making involves applying value-judgements to positive analysis of the consequences of alternative policies. We currently study the latter intensively but not the former. This module will fill the gap. It is also aimed to contribute towards your employability by increasing your literacy and capacity for logical thought.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. explain clearly the difference between positive and normative and judgements and where each one applies;
- 2. identify the ethical presuppositions concealed in policy decisions.
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 3. demonstrate expertise in welfare economics and cost-benefit analysis;
- 4. apply the economics of equality, happiness and distribution;
- 5. distinguish clearly between the different concepts of justice and equality (e.g. income, wealth, dignity).
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. communicate effectively in written English;
- 6. demonstrate ability in logical thinking.
Syllabus plan
- Positive economics and value judgements. How complete is the separation between the two?
- Does welfare economics depend on utilitarianism? Should it do so more or less than it does at the moment?
- Can we make interpersonal comparisons of utility? What are the ethical consequences of acting as if we can / we can’t?
- GDP and other measures of welfare. Which one should we choose? Do we need to choose between them at all?
- Happiness economics. Should happiness be the goals of economic policy?
- Consumerism versus a good life. Why do so many intellectuals want people to have less?
- Is there anything ethical or unethical about free markets or are they just another way of delivering the goods?
- How can we define equality? Is equality desirable? How much and what kind?
- Comparing theories of distributive justice (Mill, Hayek, Rawls, Nozick etc.)
- International distributive justice. Have rich countries an obligation to help poor ones? What about extra-terrestrial life (if found)?
- Intertemporal distributive justice. What rate of discount should we apply to the interests of future generations?
- How should life be valued and where does this lead in policy terms?
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | 118 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 22 | Lecture (11 x 2 hours) |
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 10 | 10 x 1 hour exercises / experiments / seminars |
| Guided Independent Study | 118 | Reading, research and reflection. Preparation for lectures, coursework and exam |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Presentations | 10 minutes, delivered in seminars | 1-6 | Verbal comments by tutor & other students |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 80 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | 20 | 2000 words maximum (no minimum) | 1-6 | Written |
| Exam | 80 | 2 hours and15 minutes | 1-6 | Examiners will explain their mark to students if this is requested |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essay (20%) | Essay (20%) | 1-6 | Referral/Deferral Period |
| Exam (80%) | Exam (80%) (2 hours and 15 minutes) | 1-6 | Referral/Deferral period |
Re-assessment notes
Deferral – if you have been deferred for any assessment you will be expected to submit the relevant assessment. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of deferral will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral – if you have failed the module overall (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 40%) you will be expected to submit the relevant assessment. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of referral will be capped at 40%
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
Basic reading:
- Wilfred Beckerman Economics as Applied Ethics, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011
| Credit value | 15 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 7.5 |
| Module pre-requisites | BEE1029 or BEE1034 or BEE1036 and BEE1037 |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 5 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 30/04/2015 |
| Last revision date | 21/02/2024 |
